Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interim Coach?


davos
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Snake said:

It's kinda pointless to fire Rhule in season because there's no scandal and the people behind him suck just as bad. From the film coming out I can only see a positive return on wilks being DC. Because McAdoo sucks and no ones behind him. 

I'd personally just like to hear and look at a different person during press conferences at this point if we're going to suck either way. And not have those confused sideline close ups of Rhule mid game. Sick of that too

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

I'd personally just like to hear and look at a different person during press conferences at this point if we're going to suck either way. And not have those confused sideline close ups of Rhule mid game. Sick of that too

It's going to be over either way very soon. This team isn't built to win and we have a very good chance of getting the 1st overall pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Pejorative Miscreant said:

At this point we should just use a t shirt launcher. For Rhule after first quarter and then use the launcher and randomly give coaching duties to whoever catches it.  It’s gimmicky but this will boost fan interest. 

I see.. instead of a dozen Krispy Kreme or a Bojangles Tailgate Pack you get to stand on the sidelines wear a headset. I dig this concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disclaimer: I'm not actually thinking this happens, just more adding a cute title to the thread.  

Kuechly was just born for football, really wonder what will his next spot be. I don't know but it's in his veins.  Would like to see him here in some capacity.  

Seeing our elite all-timers gives me the warm and fuzzies but damn it makes you realize how poorly our current roster is built..

Ron's Peak: Luke, TD, Cam, Kalil, Stewart, Olsen, what we have isn't even close. 

Fox's Peak: Smitty, Prime-Jake, Peppers, Rucker, Gross, Moose, Wharton, Minter, Morgan, Witherspoon, Gamble...holy crap we had talent

Now? Who's on that level?

CMC, Moore, Chinn, Moton...and a whole lot of TBDs or never will be

And these rosters all had the same time to be built.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you think about it, there are few great players who can become great coaches.  My theory:  the best coaches are the overachievers who had to outwork, out-prepare, out hustle, etc. more talented players to succeed.  I look at the NFL head coaches, and I see more players like Dan Reeves, Herm Edwards, Mike Ditka, (old school) Mike Vrabel, Frank Reich, Kliff Kingsbury, and Ron Rivera---all were either not stars or they were known for their tenacious work ethic.

My theory is the same with some teachers (I am in education).  If things occur naturally to you, as they do with the great athletes, it is difficult to coach what you never had to develop or focus on.  While Luke might be a great coach because he is so well-rounded as a person, he may not understand why you need to motivate a person to play football or how to make a player translate from the film room to the practice field to the stadium.  I dunno, but the best NFL players just are not the best coaches for some reason.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, klumme said:

Luke retired because of trauma to the head. Why in the world would he coach under Tepper and get his face kicked in day in and day out dealing with that idiot?

I seriously doubt David Teppers old 5'5 azz could kick Luke in the face...

 

Yes I understand the sarcasm here, Luke wad a defensive coordinator when he was on the feild... He would be a LBs coach or defensive coordinator already if he wanted... He seems to be enjoying the easier side of retirement, probably had somthing to do with if it weren't for the concussions he could still be playing the game at a high level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...