Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bust?


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

This is Hendersons 3rd year.  You ready to pick up his 5th year option next year?

It depends on how he plays next year, but I don’t know if we could have drafted a better CB in the 3rd (which is what we gave up for him). I’m not saying it’s never happened, but chances are slim. 
 

Realistically, we probably don’t pick up his 5th and if he plays “ok” next year he might earn an “ok” contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, *FreeFua* said:

Never understood what people saw in him to warrant his draft grade 

Isn’t explosive and isn’t going to bully anyone. Just a big athletic looking dude. Enough to get by in college but not the pros

What was his RAS score? A high one is all it takes for Rhule to want the guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, KillerKat said:

Fitt is the best GM in our history at giving this team value and Rhule has no idea what to do with it. Of course players are going to look bad when you have bad coaching. This isn`t that hard to understand.

This isn't the praise for Fitt that you think it is. This is more of an indication of how poorly ran the Panthers have been over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Doc Holiday said:

I’ll reserve judgement on this end, Brown is finally playing like the guy we hoped he be in year 3. It can sometimes take time to develop unless you’re exceptionally talented.

Brown also said he lost 15 lbs this offseason so he could be more of a pass rusher and less run stuffer. It's just they didn't bring in anyone else to actually be the run stuffing dlineman. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

I like what Fitt has done he’s stated that to build the ultimate roster is to do it around a Rookie QBs contract. Until he finally gets the chance to shoot his shot for a franchise guy in the first I’ll have faith 

If that is his philosophy then he isn’t really practicing what he preaches.  He gives up a lot of draft capital needlessly.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...