Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

QB Showcase: The Non-Stroud/Young/Levis Crowd


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

If we miss out on the top 3 QBs, as people who go to the draft thread know, I'm on the McCall bandwagon. Not a cannon for an arm, but good enough and the kid is SMART.  He doesn't make too many bad reads.  He's mobile enough to run RPO concepts at CCU.  Even the GOAT Tom Brady wasn't elite physically, but cerebral as there is in the NFL.  No, I'm not comparing McCall to Brady, just saying I'll take a 'good enough' athlete at QB that 'gets it' over a stud athlete QB that can't make it to his second read.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

The thing that sticks out to me about Stroud that is concerning is that he has built his college resume with elite talent around him. His recievers last year were Garrett Wilson and Chris Olave, that is insane.

The thing that sticks out to me about Burrow that is concerning is that he has built his college resume with elite talent around him. His recievers last year were Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase, that is insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, trueblade said:

The thing that sticks out to me about Burrow that is concerning is that he has built his college resume with elite talent around him. His recievers last year were Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase, that is insane.

And he was in year 5 of college. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, saX man said:

Going to hold Hooker where I think he in the OP but just WOWWWWW at that game tonight.

Levis time then Ward a bit later.

We'll see how much of a gap there looks to be between Young and Levis.  Young played absolutely brilliant tonight.

Hooker was just finding Hyatt all game who was pretty open. Great game though!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...