Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ADAM SCHEFTER: Panthers listening to Christian McCaffrey trade offers

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

That’s not my point. Singletary’s contract is only through this season. We obviously aren’t making a run this season and should be trading for future assets. Cook is a rookie 2nd rounder with explosive speed. He can be an asset for the future of our team. 

I get it now, though I will say that we could trade for Singletary with the promise of an extension

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Fitterer is a fuging moron

why? they just leaked "the bar" now teams know where to start when negotiating. Obviously we wont get two first round picks. However, now teams know where to start negotiating down. If they dont call, then they dont call. 

 

The bottom line is that if we trade CMC we are putting ourselves in dead cap hell.... the only thing that makes that easier to deal with is cheap talented players in the way of early round picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

why? they just leaked "the bar" now teams know where to start when negotiating. Obviously we wont get two first round picks. However, now teams know where to start negotiating down. If they dont call, then they dont call. 

 

The bottom line is that if we trade CMC we are putting ourselves in dead cap hell.... the only thing that makes that easier to deal with is cheap talented players in the way of early round picks.

If that dumb motherfuger can get a first he needs to accept it the second it comes in.  Dont be cute with this.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
*FreeFua* Grand Master

*FreeFua*

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

why? they just leaked "the bar" now teams know where to start when negotiating. Obviously we wont get two first round picks. However, now teams know where to start negotiating down. If they dont call, then they dont call. 

 

The bottom line is that if we trade CMC we are putting ourselves in dead cap hell.... the only thing that makes that easier to deal with is cheap talented players in the way of early round picks.

Yep

I’m not just trading CMC to trade him. A team needs to send something of value to make absorbing that dead cap hit worth it.

CMC is 26 year old superstar when healthy. 

CMC would be a major help for our rookie QB next year BUT trading CMC also improves our chances of landing the #1 pick

I do believe it needs to be at minimum one first rounder. Then some other picks. I sure as sh!t don’t want Singletary or Cook

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If we gave up McCaffrey for a single first, especially one expected to be low, that's what I'd consider dumb.

You are nuts, if we can get a first for cmac and his contract that is charlie sheen level winning.   I dont understand the pedestal you guys are putting cmac on.   Running backs dont move the needle in the modern nfl.  They just dont

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrevorLaurenceTime22 Grand Master

TrevorLaurenceTime22

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Yep

I’m not just trading CMC to trade him. A team needs to send something of value to make absorbing that dead cap hit worth it.

CMC is 26 year old superstar when healthy. 

CMC would be a major help for our rookie QB next year BUT trading CMC also improves our chances of landing the #1 pick

I do believe it needs to be at minimum one first rounder. Then some other picks. I sure as sh!t don’t want Singletary or Cook

If you are talking Bills or anther late first it would need to be a 1 & 3.

 

I rather hope we trade him at this point like others before him he deserves more than this sh*t show of a franchise.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...