Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you like to see CMC on the Bills?


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

How can the Rams possibly afford to trade for Brian Burns? Do they have any more 1st round picks this decade 😂.

Seriously, they seem to trade away their high draft choices every year for star players.

He could also just be playing.  It's in his story right now; may just be stirring the pot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

16 wins in almost four years that's goat status baby!

Newton plays a more important position than McCaffrey and when was the last time he won a game with us? Hadn't he lost something like 11 or 12 straight?

Wins and losses are not an individual player stat.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Newton plays a more important position than McCaffrey and when was the last time he won a game with us? Hadn't he lost something like 11 or 12 straight?

Wins and losses are not an individual player stat.

Oh this logic again. Wins and losses are a team stat when it's someone you like. Cam is done. But when his arm wasn't toast we won games and competed in our division. We need a quarterback and I'm tired of watching weirdos with a fetish for a white RB live vicariously through his garbage stats. We need a winning football team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Is that all some of you want? He leads the team in yards so you can rub your no no spot while we are still cellar dwellers? I will be relieved when he is gone you people are worse than any Cam Newton homer at least we won something back then.

I was responding to a quote genius. Damn you’re dramatic…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Oh this logic again. Wins and losses are a team stat when it's someone you like. Cam is done. But when his arm wasn't toast we won games and competed in our division. We need a quarterback and I'm tired of watching weirdos with a fetish for a white RB live vicariously through his garbage stats. We need a winning football team.

They're a team stat no matter what. Teams win. Teams lose.

And I don't give a sh-t what color a player is if he's good. McCaffrey is great as long as he's healthy. Newton was great when he was healthy but he's not anymore.

Trying to attribute wins and losses to one particular player is ignorant and illogical no matter who it is. And yes, that includes quarterbacks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, frankw said:

Oh this logic again. Wins and losses are a team stat when it's someone you like. Cam is done. But when his arm wasn't toast we won games and competed in our division. We need a quarterback and I'm tired of watching weirdos with a fetish for a white RB live vicariously through his garbage stats. We need a winning football team.

What does his skin color have to do with anything?

Are you racist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

They're a team stat no matter what. Teams win. Teams lose.

And I don't give a sh-t what color a player is if he's good. McCaffrey is great as long as he's healthy. Newton was great when he was healthy but he's not anymore.

Trying to attribute wins and losses to one particular player is ignorant and illogical no matter who it is. And yes, that includes quarterbacks.

Well it's not consistent with what I heard and saw for the better part of an entire decade. Do you remember "just win baby"? Fans used to try and console each other with stats from tough losses as a means of coping and most replies were about the win-loss column being all that matters. How about we get back to those days and stop fawning over "the best weapon in football!" that has us with a 16-39 record. We could potentially end up with the #1 pick this year. It's time for a new era. The player only fans need to figure out what they are going to do and who they are going to root for because for some of them the TEAM obviously isn't the first priority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Well it's not consistent with what I heard and saw for the better part of an entire decade. Do you remember "just win baby"? Fans used to try and console each other with stats from tough losses as a means of coping and most replies were about the win-loss column being all that matters. How about we get back to those days and stop fawning over "the best weapon in football!" that has us with a 16-39 record. We could potentially end up with the #1 pick this year. It's time for a new era. The player only fans need to figure out what they are going to do and who they are going to root for because for some of them the TEAM obviously isn't the first priority.

So you're obsessing over a player getting traded (with no regard to whether it'd be the best move for the team or not) because you don't like how people talked about your favorite player a few years and a couple of coaches ago?

Damn, dude. Let it go 😕

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

What does his skin color have to do with anything?

Are you racist?

It's obviously a factor for some and why people prop him up as one of the goats. None of our other running backs in the history of the franchise have had such a deranged cult following and his career numbers do not blow any of theirs out of the water. This is not an echo chamber you are going to have to reckon with and ponder these facts sooner or later the team obviously is going to be moving on this season or next.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...