Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let’s talk about Shaq and YGM


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, pretty much. Shaq is okay. He wouldn't be a problem if he was paid like a run of the mill starting LB but he's nowhere near the difference maker he's paid to be. I have no idea why the Panthers organization has always thought so highly of him as a player. I've never seen any signs of a special player.

 

I think they were just hoping to pay a couple Vets from the pre-Rhule days to provide some kind of crossover. Little did they know he would be a whiny biyatch anytime he has to talk to the press, and when other teammates are talking to the press he likes to throw towels and other random objects at them for some kind of stupid middle school level entertainment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shaq is overpaid for what he brings. He was great last year but I haven’t seen the same greatness this year. YGM is still young and has time to develop. Half you numbnuts were trying to give up on Brown too. At worst YGM will likely be a decent player and good depth that isn’t costing much. No need to try to get rid of him. 
 

If we could get anything for Shaq to get his contract off our books we should take it. And no one is trading a pick that we could use to replace YGM with for him, so we might as well hang onto him and see if he develops. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shaq has to be cut.  It's 12 million in cap savings.  Yes, it's nearly 12 million dead, but that's too much money to restructure while getting his salary where it should be.

YGM is one of those players who just kinda gets by.  He's not ever going to be more than an average NFL player.  Maybe he sticks around on short term deals.  But you need those players on your team.  You can't have above average players everywhere.  The NFL isn't set up that way.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

The biggest problem with Shaq is his contract.  It was another example of Hurney thinking that if we pay a guy like he is one of the best, he will become one of the best.

With RA gone, Shaq is the third highest salary next year and, if I am not mistaken, provides the biggest cap relief.  Of course, dumping/trading him is only one solution to that problem.  We have the rest of the season to figure out what options are worth it, unless somebody pushes a lot of chips into the center of the table for him.

Honestly, there are ways to fix Shaq's contract. What we can't easily do is replace Shaq's ability and leadership.

One thing we have to look at, when it comes to on field performance, is that Shaq has been hybrid played since Snow got here. Even as a MLB, Shaq spends most of his time dropping into coverage as part of Snow's Wonderbread-soft defensive scheme. He's pretty good at it, but he's also great against the run. He can't do both on every play, but you'd oftentimes see him in coverage and then having to mop up against the rushing attack. Part of that is scheme and part of that is that Snow relied on scheme more than he relied on situational decision making. Injuries to DBs over the last couple of seasons have made that even worse and pulled him more and more away from the line.

Shaq's greatest strengths lie in speed and tackling ability. When positioned properly, or allowed to roam a bit, he is great at run stops behind the line. He can just get skinny when he needs to and break through. The guy is actually a good pass rusher, too, but that has been de-emphasized since Rhule came to Carolina.

Lastly, look at the cast of characters he's had around him in the LB group. He is the ONLY continuity we've had there in three years. Luvu came in last season but was used only situationally that first year. Linebackers hunt as a pack, so to say, and that group instinct just hasn't been there. Of course, we haven't had Luke and Thomas Davis back there with him... oh what I'd give to have that trio back. Wow.

I think they should work with Shaq to restructure his deal. The guy has been a stand-up team player and leader since he got here. He'll make the move and stay hometown. If he is made to go, though, we're not going to find an easy replacement and our defense will fall apart like our offense has.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

Honestly, there are ways to fix Shaq's contract. What we can't easily do is replace Shaq's ability and leadership.

One thing we have to look at, when it comes to on field performance, is that Shaq has been hybrid played since Snow got here. Even as a MLB, Shaq spends most of his time dropping into coverage as part of Snow's Wonderbread-soft defensive scheme. He's pretty good at it, but he's also great against the run. He can't do both on every play, but you'd oftentimes see him in coverage and then having to mop up against the rushing attack. Part of that is scheme and part of that is that Snow relied on scheme more than he relied on situational decision making. Injuries to DBs over the last couple of seasons have made that even worse and pulled him more and more away from the line.

Shaq's greatest strengths lie in speed and tackling ability. When positioned properly, or allowed to roam a bit, he is great at run stops behind the line. He can just get skinny when he needs to and break through. The guy is actually a good pass rusher, too, but that has been de-emphasized since Rhule came to Carolina.

Lastly, look at the cast of characters he's had around him in the LB group. He is the ONLY continuity we've had there in three years. Luvu came in last season but was used only situationally that first year. Linebackers hunt as a pack, so to say, and that group instinct just hasn't been there. Of course, we haven't had Luke and Thomas Davis back there with him... oh what I'd give to have that trio back. Wow.

I think they should work with Shaq to restructure his deal. The guy has been a stand-up team player and leader since he got here. He'll make the move and stay hometown. If he is made to go, though, we're not going to find an easy replacement and our defense will fall apart like our offense has.

 

I agree completely @Kyber53.  I was trying to hint at contract restructuring/extension without sending our board into a tailspin.  His next contract could be his last, and with what he has shown us, I don't have a problem making that with us just at a more reasonable price.  Hence my comment about taking the rest of the year to establish his value unless somebody pushes all their chips in on him.

He is one of those guys that you can point to as victims of the last coaching staff philosophy.  They didn't kill his performance as much as they muzzled him.  Sounds a like Chinn.  Our staff excelled at that.

LBs work as a team as much as the OL does. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, therealmjl said:

Shaq is an overrated JAG who is insanely overpaid. Looking forward to moving on from that bloated contract. He has never lived up to his hype and simply isn't a difference maker. You could argue that Luvu has impacted the outcome of our games more this season in his first year at LB than Shaq has his entire career.

YGM is another JAG (at best) but at least he's on a rookie deal. Decent depth I guess but doubt we'd even notice if we moved on from him.

edit: inb4 top dawg slams me.

image.jpeg.447663469872b48531a69f30224997c9.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...