Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ Stroud

Vox

By Vox,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Varking Grand Master

Varking

Posted
Posted
Just now, JVic said:

Which further proves my point that OSU has no interest in leaning on or producing pro style talent.  They take athletes, put them at QB, and let them dominate the slower, less athletic talent in the Big 10.  If the Panthers get to play Iowa, Indiana and Purdue every week I'm all for drafting CJ Stroud.  

You say this when its clear they are producing CJ Stroud to be a QB and not an athlete. And that isn't why Burrow left either. So it doesn't really prove your point at all. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, JVic said:

Which further proves my point that OSU has no interest in leaning on or producing pro style talent.  They take athletes, put them at QB, and let them dominate the slower, less athletic talent in the Big 10.  If the Panthers get to play Iowa, Indiana and Purdue every week I'm all for drafting CJ Stroud.  

You don’t think LSU’s all NFL roster outclassed their competition? 
Incredulous Come On GIF by Almost Christmas Movie

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
davos Grand Master

davos

Posted
Posted

He had a slow start/seemed a bit off but he responded and showed in the second half. Really don’t understand the pushback here at all.

Threads needles and is super quick with his progressions. I don’t see any red flags like you typically do with others. The OSU offense definitely handicaps QBs but you have to be able to see through it.  Fields was for example a way slow processor and has a 1 second mental delay after the snap and it showed in school. It’s also why many NFL scouting rooms stayed away from him. Simply not the case with Stroud.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Grand Master

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

There have been 4 1st round OSU QBs drafted. One in the 1940s who died in war before playing, one in the 1980s, then Haskins, and Fields who is in year 2. So you are basing this on Haskins and the guy from the 80s?? Terrible logic.

Oregon has Harrington and Mariotta, and I bet they are thrilled someone like you didn’t have them pass on Herbert because there were no good Oregon QBs. Do it again for LSU with Burrow, Mahomes with Texas Tech, Cam with Auburn, Manning with Tennessee and you can keep going on and on. So like I said, terrible logic. The school has nothing to do with the prospect. 
 

Are you really comparing Stroud to Herbert?

The problem with Stroud is he is actually less gifted than Justin Fields and he's throwing to more 1st round wide receivers than we have here behind an offensive line that, within the context of the Game, is better than what we have.

Stroud, like Hooker, plays within a system that excentuates what they do well which does not translate well to the pro game as we saw with Haskins and now Fields. 

You have to look at what the guys do well. I'd rather have Bryce Young at number 1 if that was an option.

Stroud and Levis look like Day 2 picks to me. So if I have to take a QB on Day 2 or Day 3, I want McCall because he will probably be there. I don't want us to reach for a Stroud or Levis and set out team back even more. 

2023 needs to be the ultimate BPA draft.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Are you really comparing Stroud to Herbert?

The problem with Stroud is he is actually less gifted than Justin Fields and he's throwing to more 1st round wide receivers than we have here behind an offensive line that, within the context of the Game, is better than what we have.

Stroud, like Hooker, plays within a system that excentuates what they do well which does not translate well to the pro game as we saw with Haskins and now Fields. 

You have to look at what the guys do well. I'd rather have Bryce Young at number 1 if that was an option.

Stroud and Levis look like Day 2 picks to me. So if I have to take a QB on Day 2 or Day 3, I want McCall because he will probably be there. I don't want us to reach for a Stroud or Levis and set out team back even more. 

2023 needs to be the ultimate BPA draft.

You are complaining about Stroud’s system and want McCall or Hartman. It’s just a complete joke at this time. No one is taking you seriously anymore man. Go back to bragging about wanting Neal over Icky…

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheBlue Collaborator

TheBlue

Posted
Posted
On 10/22/2022 at 2:16 PM, MillionDollarCam said:

How did it age… saying he has a decent test ahead of him when Iowa was 7th in total defense coming into the game is a factual statement…. There wasn’t a single thing stated that was opinion based.

If anything, the factual statement shows how good Stroud can be… which I’m fine with because I’m a Stroud supporter…

I swear some of the people that quote me don’t have basic reading comprehension skills.

Calm down with the victim complex. 
 

it aged because Iowa’s defense got absolutely torched. 
 

but go ahead and cry if that makes you feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Grand Master

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted
34 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

You are complaining about Stroud’s system and want McCall or Hartman. It’s just a complete joke at this time. No one is taking you seriously anymore man. Go back to bragging about wanting Neal over Icky…

I didn't say I fuging WANTED HARTMAN. I said if I had to choose between taking Stroud first or Hartman later, give me Hartman later.

McCall isn't a system QB. Yall say he's a triple option QB but he threw for 400 yards and 3 or 4 touchdowns a week ago. He broke Tua's passer efficiency record. McCall is Coastal's offense whereas Hooker and Stroud are a product of theirs. You put McCall in an Ohio State uniform and it would be about the same as Stroud.

The point is that much like the 2022 draft, there are no QB's worthy of a Top 5, or even 10 pick. You don't reach for a QB at one. There is no Trevor Lawrence, Cam Newton, Mahomes, etc. type of guys. Maybe you take Bo Nix on Day 3? But you don't take Stroud at one, sorry. That's a reach.

You go Best Player Available all draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      The Hurricanes are never getting over the hump untill they spend money in the net

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I agree. Two holes FTW!
    • csx
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By csx · Posted

      Canales has his msjor issue not doing the obvious regarding running Dowdle but with an average QB we would be in the playoffs with an average QB. 
    • kungfoodude
      How long do you feel it takes for a head coach to turn a team around?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      1. fug TikTak, I ain't clicking that stupid poo. 2. This is really very situationally dependent. Coaching is a huge part but sometimes you step into a scenario where a lot of building needs to happen that is largely out of your control. Recent examples(Last season's hiring cycle): 1. Ben Johnson Johnson chose the OVERWHELMINGLY best open coaching job due to a combination of solid ownership, a solid front office and the most talented roster of the open jobs from that cycle. Negatives were, insanely stacked division. Results have so far indicated that this coaching change has been a massive boost. 2. Mike Vrabel Vrabel went a different direction. He went to a franchise that has solid ownership, a mediocre front office and one of the worst rosters in the NFL. However, he has a track record of NFL head coaching success AND lucked into one of the easiest schedules in NFL history(I believe 3rd easiest). Even with that caveat, a clear indicator that coaching has been a huge boost. 3. Pete Carroll Carroll chose one of the NFL's most volatile franchises. Notoriously bad ownership, very bad front office and a terrible roster. But, Carroll is a HOF caliber NFL HC with success at every stop. At the moment, coaching has not been able to overcome the apparent obstacles. In fact, it's been a complete disaster to the extent that Carroll has already fired multiple coaches. One could certainly argue that pethaps Pete has lost his touch but regardless, this coaching change didn't result in a turnaround and Carroll's future there seems in doubt. 4. Aaron Glenn Glenn's first HC opportunity was a doozy. Near worst ownership, a mediocre front office(at best) and a talented core group of players on an underwhelming roster. This experiment has been quite the ride to date. Glenn's personnel decisions have seemingly led to multiple close game losses(2-5 in games decided by one score or less) and the FO decided to have a roster firesale prior to the trade deadline for a wealth of draft capital. The question will be if Glenn will be given the time to actually see this future draft capital realized, now that a significant chunk of the talented core is not longer there. Coaching has not made a difference but is the franchise now setting him up to fail further? 5. Liam Coen Coen picked a mixed bag. Terrible ownership, a remade front office he essentially had a hand in selecting(or at the miminum influenced) and a middling roster. The early results show promise even if the roster shows significant flaws(and Coen shows visible frustration with his "franchise" QB every Sunday). Could be close to turning a 4 win team into a playoff berth. Coaching has mattered. 6. Brian Schottenheimer This was resoundingly viewed as a bad hire but it's also under challenging circumstances. Bad ownership in the sense that the ownership is also the front office, a future Tepper dream I assume. Very talented but very flawed roster. The initial results have been...interesting. A Cowboys team that was a bad 7-10 after a previous streak of three 12 win seasons is now....mediocre? Couple that with wild roster changes prior to the start of the season and up to the trade deadline and it makes for an incomplete picture. It's not much progress but it doesn’t appear to be regressing either. TBD. 6. Kellen Moore Moore chose the most challenging of all openings. The Saints are in the midst of a simulateous roster teardown and attempted rebuild. Decent ownership, a mixed bag in the front office(great at evaluating draft talent, less so in free agency and in salary cap management). The Saints have been awful but, they were expected to be awful. To that note, they were net sellers before the trade deadline. It was reported that Moore secured an agreement that this is long term building effort prior to taking the position so his status seems safe even while the team flounders week to week. Difficult to grade this now as the entire scenario seems to be a long term strategy. TBD.
×
×
  • Create New...