Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Welp.. Levis, Hooker or McKee come on down.

panthersgreenville

By panthersgreenville,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted (edited)

I thought our roster would get us about 5 wins this season. I might have been wrong. The Falcons, Saints, and Bucs are starting to look like trash. We have too much talent on our roster to lose to trash teams assuming the right playcalling is being made. MacD is calling better run plays, and he has been calling good pass plays all along. If PJ can play decent we could be looking at 7 wins, and that might put us too far down the draft for a QB. That would be worst case scenario.

Edited by pantherj
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jaxel Mentor

Jaxel

Posted
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

image.png.d4c5116181da8e6560ee0cc0e2f529b0.png

Why, because he 6'6"? His TD to INT is pretty bad.  If he's struggling to hit 2:1 in college, what makes you thik he's going to improve upon that in the NFL?  He's not overly athletic and the ball doesn't jump out of his hand. 

Perfect example of why NOT to draft a QB just because he's sitting on the draft board and it's a need.

No man, he plays is one of the most awful systems devoid of talent you could almost ever watch play, and some how still puts out okay numbers. Make no mistake Stanford is an awful program with no talent right now. That guy can make all the throws, great arm, good mobility. His adjuster accuracy rate is way above the numbers. You need to watch him play to understand.

 

https://www.nfldraftbuzz.com/Player/Tanner-McKee-QB-Stanford

Edited by Jaxel
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
Just now, Cavscout said:

Josh Allen was taken with the 7th pick, Lamar Jackson the 32nd, Mahomes was 10th, Watson 12th

You don't have to have the number 1 overall to get a great QB

 

It's literally a crap shoot at QB.  Even taking the #1 overall prospect at QB guarantees you zilch.  The bust rate of QBs is crazy.  I get the concept you can't be scared to take a swing and miss, but man, there's been a TON of swings that never connected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NCBlu Proficient

NCBlu

Posted
Posted (edited)

I like the just take any top QB people. That's how you end up with a Baker Mayfield as the #1 pick..  Take the right QB for your team.

L. Jackson(MVP) was #32 while top 10 QBs from that draft will be looking for new teams next yr.

Edited by NCBlu
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

No man, he plays is one of the most awful systems devoid of talent you could almost ever watch play, and some how still puts out okay numbers. Make no mistake Stanford is an awful program with no talent right now. That guy can make all the throws, great arm, good mobility. His adjuster accuracy rate is way above the numbers. You need to watch him play to understand.

It's too early in the season to study the top 10 prospects because they will shuffle a lot before the end of the season.  I will say stats sometimes don't tell the entire story, but most of the time, numbers don't lie.   I'm not saying the kid is horrible, but is he worth a top 10 pick if it comes to that?  Right now, I would say no.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, NCBlu said:

I like the just take any top QB people. That's how you end up with a Baker Mayfield as the #1 pick..  Take the right QB for your team.

L. Jackson(MVP) was #32 while 3 top 10 QBs from that draft will be looking for new teams next yr.

Look at the Jets and how picking a QB about every year or so has worked out for them!  Nobody doubts this team DESPERATELY needs a franchise QB, but desperation usually makes for bad mistakes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CmC2k Mentor

CmC2k

Posted
Posted

I don't care who the QB is just start stacking wins. Weather it's PJ, Baker, Sam, corral or some draft pick just win. Yesterday showed that there is too much talent on this team to be constantly sabotaged by poor QB play and play calling. MacAdoo looked competent and PJ didn't torpedo the ship so let's build on that and keep improving. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • WarPanthers89
      ARTICLE: Rams paid a big price in trade with Panthers to move up 13 spots for Braden Fiske

      By WarPanthers89 · Posted

      Article:  The Rams must love rookie defensive lineman Braden Fiske, because they paid the Panthers a fortune to move up in the second round and draft him. To move up from No. 52 to No. 39 and draft Fiske, the Rams gave up the 155th overall pick in this year’s draft, as well as the Rams’ second-round pick in next year’s draft. That’s a rare price to pay, for a move up of just 13 spots in the second round. In fact, according to Seth Walder of ESPN Analytics, the Rams overpaid by the most any team has overpaid to move up on Day Two of the draft in at least the last six years. Ultimately, the Rams used two second-round picks and a fifth-round pick on Fiske. That’s a lot to spend. For the Panthers, it’s a great deal that nets them a second-round pick next year in addition to Jonathon Brooks, the running back the Panthers drafted after making another trade that packaged the two picks they got from the Rams. The Panthers didn’t have a 2025 second-round pick, having shipped it to Chicago in last year’s Bryce Young trade, but now they have a second-round pick after making a good trade on Friday. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/rams-paid-a-big-price-in-trade-with-panthers-to-move-up-13-spots-for-braden-fiske
    • strato
      Panthers Select Chau Smith-Wade DB - Round 5, Pick 157

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah I don’t think I’d like this guy outside, he doesn’t fit that in the NFL.  I think he needs to stick to nickel and ST to help the defense, he’d probably contribute. I think he’d be a liability outside. I like him okay though, looking forward to seeing him.  Actually that is probably how I feel about all the picks, I like them okay and am looking forward to seeing them. I feel like they were taken for a good reason; though I may not see it yet. One shouldn’t expect to go straight down the line hit every one, butI think we’ll hit on a couple of guys in this group. 4 would be great.  
    • rayzor
      Panthers Select Xavier Legette WR - Pick 32, Round 1

      By rayzor · Posted

      i know, but to a degree to can still apply, imo. yes, the guy is a unicorn. crazy circumstances and situations i think kept him away from opportunity to prove themselves for a longer period of time. and in that he and cam are similar. cam took a couple years before he was put in a situation to show what he could do given then opportunity. same wit XL. different circumstances, for sure, but really they were drafted based on one one year of production where they looked dominant. does that mean he's going to be the cam newton of WRS? probably not.  one of the arguments against cam was that he had only one year of "real" production at a high level and those arguments were furthered by the lack of people who had transitioned into a legit starter after so little starting experience.  they were/are both unicorns. 
×
×
  • Create New...