Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Falcons Could Be Down 3 Starters This Week

Castavar

By Castavar,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Sir Purr said:

I have said it before and I will say it again. It is a proven fact that men who prefer their team to lose also prefer watching other men with their wives/girlfriends.  

 

It's also a proven fact that men who prefer to stay a bad team love me doing bad things with their girlfriend/wifes. Funny how life is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Sir Purr said:

Because EVERY top 3 pick in the history of the NFL has went on to be all-pro and taken their respective teams to the Super Bowl and are undefeated in said Super Bowls.  Duh!

You're simping pretty hard for a team with 2 wins there bud. Might want to lay off the knob for awhile. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

Screw it I gave up on the number one pick. I dont think it's possible this year with Rhule fired now. Rhule was holding them back some. We are not a super bowl team I realize but, I have a feeling the current team in place with Wilks may be a 8-9 or 9-8 team. 

We are still not a great team. The only two wins we have are in our division and we caught them right. Either way it would totally be the Panthers to lose out another year's worth of QBs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

Browns and Jets had years and years of high draft picks but still managed a remarkably long period of suckitude. 

We're not getting the first people need to come to grips with that. Next Levis will be QB1, what team does it, we don't know.

I agree with huddlers that have said Will Anderson looks like another Micah Parsons. I was here on this site lobbying hard for a Parsons+Trask draft that season.

I think Anderson definitely has "it" he's a Von Miller type, a 3-4 guy. The other elite DE is suited for 4-3 in Clemson's Myles Murphy, 6'5" 275lbs 4.5 40. Big, strong, fast, NFL frame and weight from the jump, a monster.

I'm not greedy. We wanted the organization to draft a QB capable of starting. They went out of their way to steal Ickey AND THE Matt Corral.

A month or so before that draft before the whisper campaign and Corral pushing the limits playing in the senior bowl after already having come back from that injury instead of waiting on the bag with his feet up, having acquired those two players in the same draft would have got a guy GM of the year.

People here that think Fitts has given up on Matt Corral got another thing coming. Another DE opposite Burns and a competent QB and we're back in business.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...