Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Next question without Rhule Mcadoo is better..


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

The best this offense has looked in 3 years.. No CMC or great QB play. (Not a shot at PJ because he has surprised me).. Just focusing on play calling situational play calling red zone and playing complementary football.. And I don’t think Brady could do this do to inexperience at play calling.. But Mcadoo last few weeks without Rhule has this offense looking competent and half way dangerous.. 3rd downs need to be better but at least they seem to be able to move the ball without all the weapons we had in other years..

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JawnyBlaze said:

It’s definitely better the past two games. His first post-Rhule game may have been the worst OC’d game I’ve ever seen. Even worse than Shula

I think that was Wilkes more then Mcadoo.. JMO 

I think was trying to establish a attitude of running the ball no matter what and developing trust in PJ..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

The best this offense has looked in 3 years.. No CMC or great QB play. (Not a shot at PJ because he has surprised me).. Just focusing on play calling situational play calling red zone and playing complementary football.. And I don’t think Brady could do this do to inexperience at play calling.. But Mcadoo last few weeks without Rhule has this offense looking competent and half way dangerous.. 3rd downs need to be better but at least they seem to be able to move the ball without all the weapons we had in other years..

I believe this completely but wtf was Rhule doing that had us looking so bad is my man thoughts. I know he couldn’t evaluate talent so never played the best players but what else could have he been doing that we couldn’t score over 17 look anemic weekly compared to a juiced up extra effort giving team we see now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will caveat this by saying that the defense we were going up against was not good.  Probably the worst we have faced all year.  

That being said, this is the best two game stretch for our offense since before Rhule got here.  

But we still need to learn how to win.  

Edited by Davidson Deac II
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The first half offense was terrible but he did better in the second half.  He's easily replaceable. 

I disagree.. Even in the 1st half there were wide open plays to be made and PJ was off.. The pick 6 was a good play call and would have been a big play if PJ would have made a better throw or decision..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it's strange that you still can't see where I'm coming from, and I guarantee you don't have more faith in him than I do.  You're looking at him in a vacuum, not about the team around him and the likely offensive game plans this season. We're going to be a run first team with 3 receiving options better than any of the other players on past rookie 1k seasons. If you can't understand that, then it's a you problem, not a me problem. Arizona's previous basketball coach, Sean Miller, used to do something at the first team meeting of every season and I think it's soooooooooo applicable to this situation. He'd have every player right down how many minutes/points they expected to average that season and then he'd add them up.  It would show that if they all hit those numbers, we'd score like 125 points a game and need to be playing 7 guys at a time to get their minutes. That's pretty much how you guys are putting your T-Mac expectations out there, looking solely at the player and what you think he should be able to do, not how the offense will operate as a whole. Every yard one player gets is one less yard someone else can get.  It sounds like I just have more faith in Thielen, XL, and Coker this year than most everyone else.  But a big reason for that faith is because of T-Mac and how much he'll open things up for the rest of them and Bryce being the type of QB to take the open easy passes than force it to his #1. As I've said, if any one of the following happens... Thielen ends the season sub 700 yards, XL or Coker end up sub 500 yards... Then yes, I will then shift my expectations for T-Mac's rookie year to be at least 1,000 yard season. But since I have faith in those other 3 having solid seasons, it tempers my expectations yardage totals for T-Mac this year, and this year alone.  I've also clearly stated many times that I think he's going to reach 10 TDs. If T-Mac ends the season with 800 yards and 10 TDs, while Thielen gets 900-1,000 and XL/Coker each get around 600, I don't see any world where that is a failure for a rookie season for T-Mac. Because again, we're talking about expectations, not what is possible.  So given the other WR options, I can't EXPECT T-Mac to get to the 1k mark, which is a far cry from me saying I don't think he can get there. Do you really not see the difference there?  
    • I don't recall anyone seeing this coming.  I mean, two seperate things for me.  I thought BB just might not work in college football because he is old grumpy man and college is about appealing to young kids.   So yeah, that could of gone great or horrible.  Coin flip.  This isn't that convo for me.  what we are witnessing right now play out.....this was never part of the disaster possibility/path discussed lol.  Really weird stuff.  Or maybe I missed the part where UNC hires a 20 year old "girlfriend" that apparently runs the Bill operation and before the season even starts is taking over more than just Bill but influence of the entire UNC operation.  That was her getting that official statement made today.  It was her sabotaging the Hard Knocks UNC show because she somehow wasn't the star.  Seems like elder abuse lol.  Only largely kidding.  You even got Charles Barkley saying he normally doesn't talk about personal lives of his friends but he might have to check in on Bill because this ain't normal stuff lol.  Anyway, it's entertaining.  Everything is a cartoon it seems these days.   
    • I think its strange how you were claiming this guy was the second coming of Mike Evans and you can't even get behind 1k yards? I guess I have more faith in him than you
×
×
  • Create New...