Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     


saX man
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, DJ feed me moore said:

such an L trade for the bears.

I’m not sure I see this as an L. Fields gets a weapon and the Bears weren’t going to pay Smith the money he wanted. They had half a year left on Smith and a year and a half with Claypool. Next years Bears team will have Mooney, Claypool and a first round WR to go along with 125+m in cap space for defensive help. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Varking said:

I’m not sure I see this as an L. Fields gets a weapon and the Bears weren’t going to pay Smith the money he wanted. They had half a year left on Smith and a year and a half with Claypool. Next years Bears team will have Mooney, Claypool and a first round WR to go along with 125+m in cap space for defensive help. 

claypool is a JAG though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DJ feed me moore said:

claypool is a JAG though.

Is he though? Fields works with Mooney. Is Mooney significantly better than Claypool? I don’t think so. Claypool is significantly better than everyone on the team outside of Mooney. This gives Fields two starting caliber WRs in the NFL. Claypool has gone over 850 yards two seasons in a row. How many Panthers make it to 850? Only DJ. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Looks like the Bears are using a similar approach to what the Panthers did years ago when we added big WR's in Kelvin Benjamin and Devin Funchess to make up for Cam's inaccuracy.

Bears  WR's are now Claypool, N'Keal Harry, Equanimeous St. Brown 

Mooney

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree with OP notion, QBs always get credited for game winning drives even if they do minimal. Just last night Caleb got credited for a GE drive when they basically ran the ball the whole drive and only had to go 36 yards.   And there are drives where Bryce could of had a game winning drive if not for a Legette drop vs Philly or a Chubba fumble vs Tampa 
    • You are actually, genuinely comparing Bryce to Jimmy fuging Pickles? Jimmy accounted for 3 touchdowns in his 10 starts in 2010. In Bryce’s 10 games post benching last year, he accounted for 20 touchdowns. Jimmy threw three touchdowns in 2010. Three. Bryce has thrown 10 touchdowns through 6 games. He is currently on track to throw for 3300 yards, 28 touchdowns and 14 interceptions. Wtf are we even talking about anymore. I mean seriously
    • Tepper? The guy that directs the coaches towards goals that he set for them… that guy. He is the one.    I don’t think he ever was going to be expelled from class, they had him come in for garbage time maybe the 2nd week he was benched.  I will say this. People said he wasn’t under pressure the last part of the year when he did better, but he was fighting for his career and that’s pressure. And he saved his career too. I don’t reject him for those kinds of things I reject him for the physical things. I have always brought it down to he has slim margin for error and has to be perfect. People with the tool set have a little fatter margin for error. Why make it harder on yourself? Got nothing to do with hating him.  I am no statistician but game that margin thing out a lot and see how that works. 
×
×
  • Create New...