Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The bandwagon for Grayson McCall

Chris Smitty

By Chris Smitty,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂 😂 😂

Yeah, a barely above .500 Sun Belt team is "the best team in NC".

Nevermind the three ranked ACC teams with better records...

They are the best Football program in NC by far and it's not even close.

They need a new coach. One that understands the history there.

If Wilks ever leaves the NFL he should go there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂

You are a functional idiot.

Yes they have the best program in the State. 

They have consistently won since 1986. I don't care if it was FCS. Winning is Winning. 3 national championships. 

 

UNC historically since 1980 will have two top ten seasons back to back. Then an 8 to  10 year period of .500 ball to losing then a couple more top 10 years Mac Brown then nothing again forever.

That's not a tradition. That's a bad program. 

Is UNC better this year absolutely. The coach and Brice both should have been fired for losing to UNC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You are a functional idiot.

Yes they have the best program in the State. 

They have consistently won since 1986. I don't care if it was FCS. Winning is Winning. 3 national championships. 

 

UNC historically since 1980 will have two top ten seasons back to back. Then an 8 to  10 year period of .500 ball to losing then a couple more top 10 years Mac Brown then nothing again forever.

That's not a tradition. That's a bad program. 

Is UNC better this year absolutely. The coach and Brice both should have been fired for losing to UNC.

😂 😂 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

Wouldn't put much stock in those predictions, they have Van Dyke as the 7th best QB?  Yea...no.  I think McCall goes in the 3rd  possibly 4th 

Van Dyke has some arm talent and looked legit last year.  He has played better these past couple games.  I wouldn't right him off and his arm could easily get him drafted before McCall.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, saX man said:

Considering it's mostly everyone against the idea, I'd say the opposite.  Reactive on both ends.  He could be okay, likely a mid-rounder.  Wish we got some takes on him rather than whatever this turned into you damn Carolinians and your intensity with college preferences! lol

I don't care at all about the college aspect of him but he's a middling prospect at best. He does nothing at an elite level and very little at an above average level for the NFL. 

If we took him in the 5th or lower, I wouldn't particularly care. But anything above that and I will be shaking my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...