Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The bandwagon for Grayson McCall


Chris Smitty
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂 😂 😂

Yeah, a barely above .500 Sun Belt team is "the best team in NC".

Nevermind the three ranked ACC teams with better records...

They are the best Football program in NC by far and it's not even close.

They need a new coach. One that understands the history there.

If Wilks ever leaves the NFL he should go there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

😂

You are a functional idiot.

Yes they have the best program in the State. 

They have consistently won since 1986. I don't care if it was FCS. Winning is Winning. 3 national championships. 

 

UNC historically since 1980 will have two top ten seasons back to back. Then an 8 to  10 year period of .500 ball to losing then a couple more top 10 years Mac Brown then nothing again forever.

That's not a tradition. That's a bad program. 

Is UNC better this year absolutely. The coach and Brice both should have been fired for losing to UNC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You are a functional idiot.

Yes they have the best program in the State. 

They have consistently won since 1986. I don't care if it was FCS. Winning is Winning. 3 national championships. 

 

UNC historically since 1980 will have two top ten seasons back to back. Then an 8 to  10 year period of .500 ball to losing then a couple more top 10 years Mac Brown then nothing again forever.

That's not a tradition. That's a bad program. 

Is UNC better this year absolutely. The coach and Brice both should have been fired for losing to UNC.

😂 😂 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

Wouldn't put much stock in those predictions, they have Van Dyke as the 7th best QB?  Yea...no.  I think McCall goes in the 3rd  possibly 4th 

Van Dyke has some arm talent and looked legit last year.  He has played better these past couple games.  I wouldn't right him off and his arm could easily get him drafted before McCall.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, saX man said:

Considering it's mostly everyone against the idea, I'd say the opposite.  Reactive on both ends.  He could be okay, likely a mid-rounder.  Wish we got some takes on him rather than whatever this turned into you damn Carolinians and your intensity with college preferences! lol

I don't care at all about the college aspect of him but he's a middling prospect at best. He does nothing at an elite level and very little at an above average level for the NFL. 

If we took him in the 5th or lower, I wouldn't particularly care. But anything above that and I will be shaking my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...