Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Justin Fields 61 yard rushing touchdown


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Fields is an average passer.

You can't win the Superbowl with an average passer. 

Running as a QB is a vastly overrated trait.

Especially on The Huddle 

So you say Sam Darnolds problem is mental. I agree. He is literally a moron playing QB. But you think because he has a cannon arm that its worth trotting him out there. That’s literally 90% of QBs in the NFL. Physical talent to play but not the mental make up to succeed. 
 

You said that to slight Cam who is/was an astronomically better and smarter player than Sam Darnold and Justin Fields. 

Edited by OneBadCat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OneBadCat said:

So you say Sam Darnolds problem is mental. I agree. He is literally a moron playing QB. But you think because he has a cannon arm that its worth trotting him out there. That’s literally 90% of QBs in the NFL. Physical talent to play but not the mental make up to succeed. 
 

You said that to slight Cam who’s an astronomically better and smarter player than Sam Darnold and Justin Fields. 

Yes Cam is better than both of them.

But that didn't make Cam an elite QB. He was good but we definitely need to set the bar higher than that.

We need a Mahomes, Rodgers, Brady level passer.

I don't care if the guy is a statue as long as he can deal.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoobyPls said:

He’s been horrible the majority of this season.

The first part of the season yes.  He has been playing better his past several games.  It's like he is developing or something.  Now imagine what he will do if they give him an OL or some weapons.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've never seen them outside of the structure of two very well ran organizations I'll give you that. And yes they are long in the tooth. I do think they are more than capable of getting a franchise turned around in short term capacity though. They are by no means a long term solution.
    • You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is. But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less. Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying: - playcalling: Bryce's fault - poor pass protection: Bryce's fault - defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense - Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 
    • I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win. Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.
×
×
  • Create New...