Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching Agreement?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

McAdoo actually hasn't looked so bad since Rhule was fired.

The debate though would be between he and Wilks (if there is one).

No one here can name a single Bengals corner that was playing Sunday and yet DJ Moore was absent from the game plan. 

But we got a wildcat play on our second possession or whatever it was.

McAdoo has been as advertised. Figured out. Simple. 

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if there's a disagreement about who starts or they just didn't rehearse the message to the media. 

I'm sure if Ben ran things he would have his say on who does what and when. But he's not.

It's akin to debating over which rock sinks faster.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now we see shade in every movement and moment of this organization. 

I think less is being thrown on purpose than is being cast by simple shrugs and hands thrown up in the air in exasperation.

We've got to quit acting like the organization actually knows what it is doing and is actually doing what they have planned. 

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

No one here can name a single Bengals corner that was playing Sunday and yet DJ Moore was absent from the game plan. 

But we got a wildcat play on our second possession or whatever it was.

McAdoo has been as advertised. Figured out. Simple. 

I can. Eli Apple. And I can tell you that he fuging sucks. 😂

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Right now we see shade in every movement and moment of this organization. 

I think less is being thrown on purpose than is being cast by simple shrugs and hands thrown up in the air in exasperation.

We've got to quit acting like the organization actually knows what it is doing and is actually doing what they have planned. 

 

 

Just all the rats trying to make their case to jump on one of the other 32 ships when this one inevitably sinks. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can’t really blame Baker. Stupid move unless you are tanking (which they consistently say they aren’t 🙄

PJ is still PJ, take away the DJ Moore Touchdown and I’m not sure he got the start against Cinci. 
 

Baker came in and ideally would be the hot hand. Really strange decision. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's a very small statement, but it does pop a question into my mind.

Do we know for sure that McAdoo agrees with Wilks decision to start PJ?

 

Yeah and he completely poo the bed in the multiple opportunities he got prior to getting injured.  McAdoo also failed as an OC.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Can’t really blame Baker. Stupid move unless you are tanking (which they consistently say they aren’t 🙄

PJ is still PJ, take away the DJ Moore Touchdown and I’m not sure he got the start against Cinci. 
 

Baker came in and ideally would be the hot hand. Really strange decision. 

Right because they CANNOT come out and say they are tanking.  Its against the rules.  Hell, it might even be illegal fraud.  But everybody knows when its happening. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regardless of how we got here, any rational fan should be excited by how well Bryce played down the stretch. Anyone not happy about that level of play either doesn't know what they're looking at, or they're still trying to drive tired narratives. Obviously, Cam had an all-time rookie season, and I'm not putting the two in the same basket yet, but as someone who has watched every snap of Panthers football since the start of the new millennium (Im old), Bryce was playing at a higher level at the end of 2024 than Cam was at the end of 2012 (his 2nd season). Cam continued to develop into MVP form, something Bryce has to prove, but as someone who watched both (and will stan for Cam always), Bryce was playing at a higher level to end year 2 than Cam did.  Go watch the film if you dont believe me. None of that means anything for the future. But the people who said BY9 couldnt play in this league are wrong.   That being said, the only thing that matters is this year. #20 is perfectly fair IMO going into the season. I mean think about it, how would you rank him??!  His in-season turnaround is one of the wildest things I've ever seen... how do you rank a guy who looked like a massive bust in September and by January was consistently playing at a top 10 level? My excitement level is pretty damn high heading into this season. There were throws from the Chiefs game onward where Bryce had Drew Brees levels of anticipation. Im excited to see what he can do with a full deck on offense, something we really never gave Cam. Really hope and expect Bryce to move up this list this season.  
    • Not really, the only QB's (other than Anthony Richardson) ranked below him are new to their teams as a placeholder starter or drafted in 2024 or 2025, not a lot of gymnastics to get there. It's not about how many that is, if it's 20, 12, or 2... It means there isn't a QB who's team has committed to them for the long term right now that they have ranked below Bryce. That's not a great thing.
    • The changes to onside kicks were ridiculous and ruined a significant part of the game     It was already a high risk low reward play.  Why change it?
×
×
  • Create New...