Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching Agreement?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

McAdoo actually hasn't looked so bad since Rhule was fired.

The debate though would be between he and Wilks (if there is one).

No one here can name a single Bengals corner that was playing Sunday and yet DJ Moore was absent from the game plan. 

But we got a wildcat play on our second possession or whatever it was.

McAdoo has been as advertised. Figured out. Simple. 

  • Pie 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if there's a disagreement about who starts or they just didn't rehearse the message to the media. 

I'm sure if Ben ran things he would have his say on who does what and when. But he's not.

It's akin to debating over which rock sinks faster.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right now we see shade in every movement and moment of this organization. 

I think less is being thrown on purpose than is being cast by simple shrugs and hands thrown up in the air in exasperation.

We've got to quit acting like the organization actually knows what it is doing and is actually doing what they have planned. 

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

No one here can name a single Bengals corner that was playing Sunday and yet DJ Moore was absent from the game plan. 

But we got a wildcat play on our second possession or whatever it was.

McAdoo has been as advertised. Figured out. Simple. 

I can. Eli Apple. And I can tell you that he fuging sucks. 😂

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Right now we see shade in every movement and moment of this organization. 

I think less is being thrown on purpose than is being cast by simple shrugs and hands thrown up in the air in exasperation.

We've got to quit acting like the organization actually knows what it is doing and is actually doing what they have planned. 

 

 

Just all the rats trying to make their case to jump on one of the other 32 ships when this one inevitably sinks. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can’t really blame Baker. Stupid move unless you are tanking (which they consistently say they aren’t 🙄

PJ is still PJ, take away the DJ Moore Touchdown and I’m not sure he got the start against Cinci. 
 

Baker came in and ideally would be the hot hand. Really strange decision. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's a very small statement, but it does pop a question into my mind.

Do we know for sure that McAdoo agrees with Wilks decision to start PJ?

 

Yeah and he completely poo the bed in the multiple opportunities he got prior to getting injured.  McAdoo also failed as an OC.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Can’t really blame Baker. Stupid move unless you are tanking (which they consistently say they aren’t 🙄

PJ is still PJ, take away the DJ Moore Touchdown and I’m not sure he got the start against Cinci. 
 

Baker came in and ideally would be the hot hand. Really strange decision. 

Right because they CANNOT come out and say they are tanking.  Its against the rules.  Hell, it might even be illegal fraud.  But everybody knows when its happening. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...