Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official hey the Panthers are wearing black helmets GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The teams that suck perennially suck because they can't build a good organization because the owner ultimately sucks. And THAT is my biggest fear for the Panthers. Because so far Tepper is looking like he sucks. Hard.

ah poo didnt actually factor tepper in.

maybe hes a wild card, and will change this offseason...... maybe?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

A new coach is going to bring his own atmosphere. Winning some meaningless games this year has zero impact on the future... other than draft position.

i think i just disagree with how something like winning gets taken.

Do you want to convince an absolute loser of a team they good, or

remind a good team in a bad situation that they are good.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Alemanders said:

i think i just disagree with how something like winning gets taken.

Do you want to convince an absolute loser of a team they good, or

remind a good team in a bad situation that they are good.

I want the most draft capital I can possibly get. The talent in the locker room is the talent in the locker room. Them winning 2 games or 5 games last year doesn't have a huge impact overall. They're still a down trodden team needing lifting up and better coaching that's what I was hired to do. Give me all the draft capital to work with to keep building a more talented overall roster.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I want the most draft capital I can possibly get. The talent in the locker room is the talent in the locker room. Them winning 2 games or 5 games last year doesn't have a huge impact overall. They're still a down trodden team needing lifting up and better coaching that's what I was hired to do. Give me all the draft capital to work with to keep building a more talented overall roster.

ok id argue there is a duality in place here. Putting in a good effort and losing sucks less a meaning less win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

True enough, except the reality is that Panthers are not a winning franchise. We're not the Chiefs, or the Ravens.

We're the 5 win team.

we kind of are, though. i mean we're not in the top echelon of franchises obviously, but 2 SB appearances and a smattering of deep playoff runs and 12-4 seasons over the past 20 years is more than a whole lot of franchises can say.

at the very least we're as good as a franchise as the modern era Chiefs were before they got Andy Reid and developed a winning culture. that's what i think our priority should be this offseason, finding our Andy Reid more than our Trevor Lawrence.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rodeo said:

we kind of are, though. i mean we're not in the top echelon of franchises obviously, but 2 SB appearances and a smattering of deep playoff runs and 12-4 seasons over the past 20 years is more than a whole lot of franchises can say.

at the very least we're as good as a franchise as the modern era Chiefs were before they got Andy Reid and developed a winning culture. that's what i think our priority should be this offseason, finding our Andy Reid more than our Trevor Lawrence.

We're a losing franchise with a handful of good seasons. We're basically the Bucs over the same time period except they actually got two rings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, rodeo said:

we kind of are, though. i mean we're not in the top echelon of franchises obviously, but 2 SB appearances and a smattering of deep playoff runs and 12-4 seasons over the past 20 years is more than a whole lot of franchises can say.

at the very least we're as good as a franchise as the modern era Chiefs were before they got Andy Reid and developed a winning culture. that's what i think our priority should be this offseason, finding our Andy Reid more than our Trevor Lawrence.

I think you conveniently said “Trevor Lawrence” instead of “Patrick Maholmes”.  Andy Reid didn’t win a Superb Owl until Patty Maholmes.  Coaches are very important don’t get me wrong…. But priority for this panthers team is 100% QB.  Don’t forget, we went to a SB with Ron Rivera and a bunch of JAG WR’s, because of Cam Newton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, stbugs said:

You could also say that it took a miracle Hail Mary with 12 seconds left just to allow DJ to take his helmet off. You can complain about the penalty and missed kicks but if you are going to replay that game, 9 times out of 10 we don’t score the TD to tie.

We are 2-3 so far but we’ve also played 3 division games going 2-1. We are still 3-1 in the worst division and 0-6 outside the division. Rhule was 1-0 in division and 0-4 out of the division. Look at how bad we got linked in Cincinnati.

Mariota was awful tonight and PJ got really lucky to not throw multiple picks. If Koo hits his extra point and Grant catches that easy interception, we lose. That’s the nature of close games in the NFL. We are 2-3 post Rhule and that’s what we should be. The rest of the year will be interesting because we only have two division games left and both are on the road.

That’s just too much work. So I’ll stick with what i wrote. ❤️

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No it's not, there isn't a single coach who's only job is to win games, because no coach is going to win games unless they're also improving the quality of play out of their players. For coaches with contending teams, winning is their #1 job, but I think it's a more than reasonable take to say that coaches of not yet contending teams winning comes second to making your players better. We have 11 games left, if you gave me the option of winning all 11 of the games in terribly ugly fashion to where we don't improve the quality of our players vs we lose all 11 games, but do so in spectacular fashion where our players show significant improvement, I'm taking option B every time. Because option B is the path to future and long term success, while option A is a path to short term happiness at the expense of long term franchise stability.   And yes, that is clearly an extreme example that could never actually play out in either way, but you still know what I mean.  And no, it has nothing to do with draft position, it's about how good will these players be a year, 2 years, 3 years, etc, down the line, when you hope to be a true contending team, because nobody actually thinks we're that type of team this year unless you're literally crazy
    • Yeah if that's what we're signing up for here, then I just can't get behind it.  That contract extension that Hurney gave Jake that offseason was BRUTAL.
    • That's quite literally his only job. Every year has new goals, new identities, etc. But the one constant is to win at all costs. He isn't guaranteed to be here next year UNLESS he wins. Why would he give a poo to mold a bunch of players someone else might be coaching? 
×
×
  • Create New...