Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis Williams. Char observer on top 4 QBs Note, This is not in depth


Varking
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I think if darnold plays competent we win a couple more.  I am counting on sunday as a win but if we somehow lose to the broncs I think pick 2 is still in play.

If we lose to the Broncos it’s going to be one of the few losses this year I’m truly baffled by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I think if darnold plays competent we win a couple more.  I am counting on sunday as a win but if we somehow lose to the broncs I think pick 2 is still in play.

Darnold offers the possibility of an iron clad loss but it's hard to underestimate how terrible Denver is.

I would love to lose out and secure a top 3 pick but it would be much better to beat Denver, IMO.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Darnold offers the possibility of an iron clad loss but it's hard to underestimate how terrible Denver is.

I would love to lose out and secure a top 3 pick but it would be much better to beat Denver, IMO.

Denvers defense is really good but there offense is as equally bad.  I gotta think the home team has the advantage here. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This. Yeah, I get the size concerns with Young. Yeah I get the concerns that Stroud might not translate if he was on a lesser team. Yeah, I fully get that Richardson is boom or bust. But damn it, at some point you gotta take your swing. If you whiff swing again.

None of the best young QBs currently in the league were slam dunk prospects. They all had significant question marks.

A boom or bust prospect should at least be somewhat within the boom range.

I am not seeing that for Richardson. Outside of physically looking the part and having a good arm, he has no other valid QB qualities. That's a problem.

Even Levis has times where you clearly see QB qualities in his play. Richardson rarely had any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

A boom or bust prospect should at least be somewhat within the boom range.

I am not seeing that for Richardson. Outside of physically looking the part and having a good arm, he has no other valid QB qualities. That's a problem.

Even Levis has times where you clearly see QB qualities in his play. Richardson rarely had any.

Go back and watch Josh Allen in college. You're gonna be shocked.

 

 

When I say he was wildly inaccurate I'm not exaggerating. Dude couldn't hit water from a fuging boat.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I came over from the old Panthers Insider site. When Fox Sports bought that platform it slowly just started dying plus the guy who ran that site was dealing with some pretty significant health issues so the whole thing just slowly fell apart. Quite a few of us migrated over here. Not sure how many are still around.  I miss that place. It struck a nice balance of having enough active posters to keep productive conversation flowing but didn't have so much traffic that you end up with a lot of trolling BS. This place is getting there though since we shutdown new registrations but at some point we're going to have to open it back up or we'll watch this place slowly die off too as posters fall off for one reason or another. We just have to figure out a way to filter out the spam bots. It was a never ending battle to ban the spam bots to keep then from overrunning the site. You'd think they'd be a little more strategic. I mean, if you fill a site with nothing but spam people are just going to stop coming so it's not a sustainable model. But nope, every one of them makes dozens of duplicate threads filling up pages upon pages as soon as their account goes live.
    • lol...I don't remember that.  Although recalling what I had for breakfast yesterday is sometimes a challenge.  Hope it was a positive thing.
×
×
  • Create New...