Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft position updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, MartyClemons said:

 

Missing out on Young is not ideal. But if we decide not to go QB there’s plenty of players at positions of need that have potential. We could add to the O-Line with Skoronski, boast our Dline with Bresee, or add a playmaker in Johnston/Addison, or a TE in Mayer.

 

This wouldn’t be my strategy but Addison is the one guy in this draft, if we’re there, and Young and Stroud are taken, I’d just take JA. He is of the Diggs meets G Wilson mold. His game is just so translatable, he does everything. Monster. The one guy I’m absolutely sure on. He’s done it in 2 different college offenses and proved to be the best in the country at it. Get him to pair with Moore and figure QB out in a trade up or what have you.

He’d be that level of a bump up offensively in my view no matter the QB. and then maybe try to trade up to the back of the first for Richardson or McKee. I dunno 🤷🏼‍♂️ 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Dude, if your nuts look like this.... You need to see a doctor. 

Awww did I hurt the little boy's feelings?

You cry babies over draft position are just that.   Cry babies.  

Then again, you're probably the same ones that have never played a single minute of sports.

Don’t throw stones mate your the softest bloke on here when someone has a different opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

If that’s what you believe I’m a bit worried about you. Are you ok mate? 

Absolutely,  I have talked with you several times especially about Tanking and Corral.  You cannot nor will not accept that you might be wrong.   Apparently, you know more about American football than anyone else on this board. 

I don't think I have seen one positive post on any subject you comment on.  All negative, all trolling.

You should look in the mirror because everything you accuse me of, you're the leader in the clubhouse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Absolutely,  I have talked with you several times especially about Tanking and Corral.  You cannot nor will not accept that you might be wrong.   Apparently, you know more about American football than anyone else on this board. 

I don't think I have seen one positive post on any subject you comment on.  All negative, all trolling.

You should look in the mirror because everything you accuse me of, you're the leader in the clubhouse. 

It’s an opinion board I share my opinion each to their own. I have plenty of positive things to say. My takes are based on common sense like. 
 

A 3rd round rookie QB who lost their entire rookie season to injury would have to be a massive outlier to become a franchise guy.

We should have trade Burns for the Rams 2nd and 2 firsts because they’re a crumbling side. Also using the money he was gonna command on Free Agents 

I want us to have the highest pick available so if our front office identifies a franchise QB in this draft we don’t have to mortgage our future gambling on him. 
 

That’s about all the hot topics for the last couple of weeks I can think of 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aussie Tank said:

It’s an opinion board I share my opinion each to their own. I have plenty of positive things to say. My takes are based on common sense like. 
 

A 3rd round rookie QB who lost their entire rookie season to injury would have to be a massive outlier to become a franchise guy.

We should have trade Burns for the Rams 2nd and 2 firsts because they’re a crumbling side. Also using the money he was gonna command on Free Agents 

I want us to have the highest pick available so if our front office identifies a franchise QB in this draft we don’t have to mortgage our future gambling on him. 
 

That’s about all the hot topics for the last couple of weeks I can think of 

I wouldn't fret too much, if you look at the remaining schedule, our spot in the top 8 should be a safe bet. 

I could see us as high as third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the most prudent path to becoming a playoff team soon is to sign Jimmy G and add a solid TE.  Any QB we draft is going to by a wildcard and likely take years to develop.  We have a young and solid OL and run game in place with a stout defense.  All you need with that is a solid NFL WB who can game manage, similar to the Delhomme years.

Jimmy G has the same record as a starting QB in SF as Steve Young had thru 59 starts….he’s good enough 

Edited by FugginPoo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, FugginPoo said:

I think the most prudent path to becoming a playoff team soon is to sign Jimmy G and add a solid TE.  Any QB we draft is going to by a wildcard and likely take years to develop.  We have a young and solid OL and run game in place with a stout defense.  All you need with that is a solid NFL WB who can game manage, similar to the Delhomme years.

Jimmy G has the same record as a starting QB in SF as Steve Young had thru 59 starts….he’s good enough 

you a crazy mofo

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, FugginPoo said:

I think the most prudent path to becoming a playoff team soon is to sign Jimmy G and add a solid TE.  Any QB we draft is going to by a wildcard and likely take years to develop.  We have a young and solid OL and run game in place with a stout defense.  All you need with that is a solid NFL WB who can game manage, similar to the Delhomme years.

Jimmy G has the same record as a starting QB in SF as Steve Young had thru 59 starts….he’s good enough 

Please….no more retreads. Agree on the strong D and running game.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The aversion to tying up too much money in the ground game when it’s what’s winning us games is crazy to me. I get letting Rico walk if you think he’s easily replaceable but I don’t see many people arguing that, just applying an arbitrary salary cap based on what we think RBs are currently worth. I’d rather be stuck with Hubbard as an overpaid backup (not the worst one to have, mind you) than lose out on the most productive player on the offense personally.
    • Why do people keep saying things like “it’s not Young’s fault we spent so much to draft him”? Who cares if it’s his fault?  Nobody is saying send him to jail or anything.  People aren’t talking about blame for the decision to draft him, they’re talking about how bad he is as a QB and how we’d be much better with even an average QB.  Pointing out that we sunk a lot of resources into drafting him isn’t invalidated because he didn’t make that decision himself. Doesn’t matter whose fault that was, he’s still not playing like a QB who was drafted at all, much less one that cost two firsts, two seconds and a #1 WR. 
    • Might wanna edit your post https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2025/01/13/rams-vikings-live-score-updates-nfl-playoffs/77665954007/
×
×
  • Create New...