Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule: “I wish I never took the job”


CashNewton22
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, countryboi said:

Rhule was a fuging snake oil salesman, he could sell his mediocrity to anyone which is why he stays employed but when he sounded like a youth pastor at his initial press conference that should have been a red flag.  

His grandpa was a baseball umpire and his dad was in fact a founder of a Christian ministry so the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LMFAO at him on Eisen saying there wasn't anyone to take at QB.  Umm who is QB for the best record in football? 

On why he didn't:

Quote

“No. Cause there was really no one. Well, I shouldn’t say that, Justin Fields is playing really well and Mac Jones is someone that I have a lot of respect for. Sometimes articles come out after you get fired that go, ‘Hey, why didn’t you guys get Justin Herbert?’ Well, ya know, because he got drafted in front of us. And, ya know, I wasn’t the GM. I didn’t make the picks.

Um, you're missing an MVP front runner Rhule, anyone ringing a bell?

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yikes 😬

He's basically saying Tepper misled him, and that if he were told differently or given more time he could have produced.

He references Wilks, but seems to ignore the fact that the team only improved after he left and some of his loyalists were fired.

Wonder how the players who defended him while he was here would feel about this.

You were right as he is the biggest snakeoil salesman out there especially in the coaching world. I mean how the hell is Nebraska buying in with this lack of accountability? 

But the players who defended him, especially the Baylor and Temple players still would have been down because most of them don't have the talent to grace any other NFL roster. The others had to be toeing the company line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I give Scott a lot of credit but I deserve some of the credit" but "I wasn't the GM" in the same breath.  

The wild thing is that these are the same hosts absolutely (and appropriately) burning Zach Wilson at the stakes for not taking accountability, meanwhile, laughing away with this rambling, incoherent buffoon doing the same thing as a coach to his former employer out in the open.  Multiple times, on multiple channels.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...