Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson declares for the draft


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Jimmy, stick to something you know. 

Says the poster thinking teams will avoid a prospect because of his school… 

Yeah I bet no NFL teams will attend AR’s pro day because “most teams don’t look at the Gators program.” 

I thought you were going to bed???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

So not a lot of college experience or reps and little to no college production in a QB you would draft in the top 10.. All that says is this would be a straight up potential projection pick.. So the only safe guard to that is a coaching staff with YEARS of experience and history in developing Quarterbacks and offensives from scratch…

We get that but what’s the other option?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

So not a lot of college experience or reps and little to no college production in a QB you would draft in the top 10.. All that says is this would be a straight up potential projection pick.. So the only safe guard to that is a coaching staff with YEARS of experience and history in developing Quarterbacks and offensives from scratch…

The production makes sense. I agree, you definitely want a staff that knows how to develop QBs. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

We get that but what’s the other option?

Not much..

1. Hire that kind of coaching staff and draft him or Levi’s..

2. Trade up to Chicago and get Stroud..

3. Resign Sam and Draft Hooker later in the draft and let the bridge situation happen for either Corral or Hooker..

4. Trade for Carr and Draft Hooker Later..

just a few thoughts off the top ..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

The production makes sense. I agree, you definitely want a staff that knows how to develop QBs. 

And that becomes another issue because there not many of those out here.. 
 

Plus jmo I would like to find away to keep Wilkes..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WOW!! said:

Not much..

1. Hire that kind of coaching staff and draft him or Levi’s..

2. Trade up to Chicago and get Stroud..

3. Resign Sam and Draft Hooker later in the draft and let the bridge situation happen for either Corral or Hooker..

4. Trade for Carr and Draft Hooker Later..

just a few thoughts off the top ..

How the fug did we get to this point?  Basically all of those options suck.  I would just go option 1 and pray it works.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

How the fug did we get to this point?  Basically all of those options suck.  I would just go option 1 and pray it works.   

Tepper being a big mouth and Rhule being stupid.. Should have kept Teddy and drafted Fields.. Impatient ppl running this team put us here..

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

How the fug did we get to this point?  Basically all of those options suck.  I would just go option 1 and pray it works.   

The Browns and Jets folks say the same thing.  One gave the biggest guaranteed contract to a serial pervert and the other just benched their QB of the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Tepper being a big mouth and Rhule being stupid.. Should have kept Teddy and drafted Fields.. Impatient ppl running this team put us here..

So if we miss out on Stroud/Young, don't make it worse by drafting guys with high bust potential.  Talk about setting a franchise back.  That will wreck a new coaching staff.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RJK said:

Richardson is more athletic running to the bathroom clinching his cheeks than corral will ever be, but I agree he’s not a high 1st rounder, maybe late 1st (Lamar) or 2nd 

Im hoping if we can keep ourselves where we are at or move up a position or two we can snag a QB round 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Not much..

1. Hire that kind of coaching staff and draft him or Levi’s..

2. Trade up to Chicago and get Stroud..

3. Resign Sam and Draft Hooker later in the draft and let the bridge situation happen for either Corral or Hooker..

4. Trade for Carr and Draft Hooker Later..

just a few thoughts off the top ..

I mean if we are wanting to draft a QB we should hire a staff great at developing QBs regardless. I think we will be rolling with option 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The statements I've made are true. 

I'm not interested in the grade school bickering that passes off as debate around here.  My argumentative days are long behind me. 

So I really don't give a fug, Jimmy. Nothing you have said makes what I've said untrue. Just because I chose not to bicker with you, doesn't mean anything. 

I never said Anthony can't be a good one. Not a single post did insay that. So no where have I had to back track. 

The Gators haven't produced any QB that hasn't been a Panther, that I would have ever been happy with as a starter here. 

Yall enjoy bickering, and claiming meaningless victories on a message board.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oddly feeling really good about tonight. fug the heat
    • Here are my takeaways from the conference (IMO): - Is Dan against taking a WR 3 years in a row? No. Would that be his preference? Also, no. Not by a long shot.  - I think draft gurus are wrong. Tight end is not an early priority. They like the guys in the building enough to see them develop, but a later round guy is being looked at (just seemed like he was able to label a couple of guys "talented", but stopped short of suggesting the class is good at the top. Seemed quick to talk about the depth of the class) - If we are taking a DL, it will be in the top 2 rounds. They fall off a cliff at some point soon after. - They are targeting guys in each round. I think we are more likely to move up than down in this draft to prevent missing out on a guy. He doesn't want to give up a lot though, man loves his draft picks. - DBs are a priority. We want to come away with a safety and a nickel. Maybe even a safety that can play nickel. Thieneman sounds more and more like a real possibility, if he is there. We are taking a safety in the first 2 rounds, if I had to put money on it. - Age matters more for 1st round picks, probably (Mesidor), but not for after that (Stukes). - They have a guy or two that they want in the 1st round, but crazy things DO happen in the draft, and they may shift gears and take a different guy if someone falls that they didn't expect to be there.  - Character matters. A LOT. If a guy has character concerns of any kind, you can be pretty confident they aren't on our board. They may bring in a guy or two for a visit to gauge the validity/severity of the concern though.      
    • Yeah don't wanna see anyone get hurt.  Hopefully Chatters is sitting.
×
×
  • Create New...