Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

let's talk about Brock Purdy and Mike White


GOAT
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 12/8/2022 at 6:36 AM, BrianS said:

Statistically speaking, QB's selected in the first round hit at a rate of about 50%.  Which isn't wonderful . . . until you consider that QB's selected in every other round hit at a rate of about 10%.  Coaching and system play a huge role in this, yes, but the delta between round 1 and all other rounds is so high that you simply can't ignore it.

Hit at 50%?

125 QBs selected in the 1st round. 18 of them have won a SB. 38 Have produced at least 1 GWD in the playoffs.

What is your baseline for a 1st round QB that hits to get them to hit 50%?

Undrafted QBs can lead teams to 8 wins in a season. They can lead teams to the playoffs. You don't need to waste draft capital on a 1st round QB if this is all you need for a successful QB.

Counting QBs who never get a start/opportunity in the NFL as part of the population is comical. QBs are capable and saying that you would count Kurt Warner, Jake Delhomme, or Taylor Heinicke as a negative if they never got a start is a big reason why the NFL keeps getting it wrong.

Just over 80 QBs were selected in the 1st round in the first 4.5 decades. In the last decade, 40 QBs have been selected in the 1st round. That is a glaring red flag.

A good starting point is a baseline of 5 starts in the NFL. See what happens when you consider only QBs who get an opportunity in the NFL. There are about 450 QBs in the modern draft era who qualify for this.

... or you can lump in all the QBs coming out of college who never got a shot in the NFL and tout the 1st rounders even harder. Then you can scratch your head and wonder why SB winning QBs and GWD playoff QBs are not heavily weighted to drafting 1st round QBs.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CPantherKing said:

Hit at 50%?

125 QBs selected in the 1st round. 18 of them have won a SB. 38 Have produced at least 1 GWD in the playoffs.

What is your baseline for a 1st round QB that hits to get them to hit 50%?

Undrafted QBs can lead teams to 8 wins in a season. They can lead teams to the playoffs. You don't need to waste draft capital on a 1st round QB if this is all you need for a successful QB.

Counting QBs who never get a start/opportunity in the NFL as part of the population is comical. QBs are capable and saying that you would count Kurt Warner, Jake Delhomme, or Taylor Heinicke as a negative if they never got a start is a big reason why the NFL keeps getting it wrong.

Just over 80 QBs were selected in the 1st round in the first 4.5 decades. In the last decade, 40 QBs have been selected in the 1st round. That is a glaring red flag.

A good starting point is a baseline of 5 starts in the NFL. See what happens when you consider only QBs who get an opportunity in the NFL. There are about 450 QBs in the modern draft era who qualify for this.

... or you can lump in all the QBs coming out of college who never got a shot in the NFL and tout the 1st rounders even harder. Then you can scratch your head and wonder why SB winning QBs and GWD playoff QBs are not heavily weighted to drafting 1st round QBs.

There’s too many variables mate as to why QBs succeed coaching, play calling surrounding talent and the list goes on. 
It all comes down to coaching and having talent around them because mainly traits will get a QB drafted early. Without being privy to what’s going on between these blokes ears with everything surrounding a QB being equal I’d rather have the more talented QB prospect 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@CPantherKingmakes a good point about many quarterbacks simply not getting a chance. 
 

A 1st rounder nearly always gets a chance. 
 

Let’s use our very own Sam Darnold as an example. If he was drafted day 3, do you think he’d still be given chances? Or would he be out of the league?

If he was a late round pick with the same talent, he may not ever see the field. 
 

Early draft picks can be the most talented, but other factors are money invested, front office reputation attached  to those players, perception of talent based on draft position, etc. 

 

Makes you wonder if there was another Montana lite out there, who didn’t get burn. I don’t think talent always prevails. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

@CPantherKingmakes a good point about many quarterbacks simply not getting a chance. 
 

A 1st rounder nearly always gets a chance. 
 

Let’s use our very own Sam Darnold as an example. If he was drafted day 3, do you think he’d still be given chances? Or would he be out of the league?

If he was a late round pick with the same talent, he may not ever see the field. 

Carson Wentz comes to mind.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Wundrbread33 said:

@CPantherKingmakes a good point about many quarterbacks simply not getting a chance. 
 

A 1st rounder nearly always gets a chance. 
 

Let’s use our very own Sam Darnold as an example. If he was drafted day 3, do you think he’d still be given chances? Or would he be out of the league?

If he was a late round pick with the same talent, he may not ever see the field. 
 

Early draft picks can be the most talented, but other factors are money invested, front office reputation attached  to those players, perception of talent based on draft position, etc. 

 

Makes you wonder if there was another Montana lite out there, who didn’t get burn. I don’t think talent always prevails. 

 

The Packers have had 2 HOF QBs over the last 26yrs. And have a whopping 2 SB wins. Talent alone can't do diddly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Purdy and White aside, this shows that at least in the short term a team can win a game manager QB as long as it has solid upper management, a competent coaching staff and a solid overall roster.

What does the Panthers have in that regard? None of the three and fans thinking we are a QB away (no matter the draft status) from being contenders. Sad, so very sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, stbugs said:

The funniest part in these stupid discussions about 1st round QBs not being worth it is that there aren’t even enough starting slots to make every 1st rounder a success. When you consider the non-1st rounders starters like Brady and that the past 4-5+ draft picks are still around, all the 1st round busts don’t really have a chance. Only 32 starting spots.

They don't really have a chance? Why are they losing their jobs to undrafted QBs? Why are they not good enough to beat out a late round pick for the #2 QB position? Name me a 1st round QB bust with less than 5 starts in the NFL.

Trubisky is closing out his career as an NFL QB at this very moment.

Mayfield, Darnold, Rosen, Wentz, Bortles, Manziel, Bridgewater, Manuel, Griffin, Luck, and Weeden are done.

Goff, Watson, Winston, and Mariota are on their way out.

Lynch is the only 1st rounder in the past 10 years you can claim did not get a shot.

Meanwhile, Cooper Rush, Tyler Huntley, Taylor Heinicke, PJ Walker, John Wolford, Jimmy Garoppolo, Nick Foles, Mike White, Andy Dalton, Geno Smith, Case Keenum, Gardner Minshew, Brandon Allen, Kyle Allen, Davis Mills, Tyrod Taylor, Colt McCoy, Nick Mullens, and Trevor Siemian are the QBs with roster spots.

Your argument doesn't hold up. These 1st rounders got their shot and failed to be better than non-1st rounders.

Kirk Cousins, Tom Brady, Dak Prescott, Russell Wilson, and Derek Carr are the only non-1st round QBs who have locked in their spots. So, there are 59 QB roster spots for these 1st rounders. There have been 39 1st round QBs selected since 2010. I think there are plenty of spots in the NFL for all of these 1st round QBs. They just are not as good as undrafted QBs like Heinicke. They continually failed to prove they could win in the NFL.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...