Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DJ Moore game time decision and Shenault also injured impact on game plan


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I swear Laviska is always hurt.  Never has anyone played so little and hurt so much.  
 

Excerpts from Ellis Williams, Charlotte Observer 

The Carolina Panthers may be without two of their top receivers Sunday against the Pittsburgh Steelers.

Laviska Shenault is another pillar of the Panthers’ run-pass option scheme. His presence as a slot receiver running bubble screens threatens opposing linebackers and forces them to expand with him, which opens run lanes for running backs D’Onta Foreman, Chuba Hubbard, and Raheem Blackshear.

One concern that was D.J. (Moore) was limited and still is questionable. We’ll check his status as we proceed and move forward,” Panthers interim coach Steve Wilks said. “It’s not so much of a setback. It just really is trying to see whether or not he’s going to be able to sustain and be efficient.”

Tee Higgins is next man up for Laviska 

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

I swear Laviska is always hurt.  Never has anyone played so little and hurt so much.  
 

Excerpts from Ellis Williams, Charlotte Observer 

The Carolina Panthers may be without two of their top receivers Sunday against the Pittsburgh Steelers.

Laviska Shenault is another pillar of the Panthers’ run-pass option scheme. His presence as a slot receiver running bubble screens threatens opposing linebackers and forces them to expand with him, which opens run lanes for running backs D’Onta Foreman, Chuba Hubbard, and Raheem Blackshear.

One concern that was D.J. (Moore) was limited and still is questionable. We’ll check his status as we proceed and move forward,” Panthers interim coach Steve Wilks said. “It’s not so much of a setback. It just really is trying to see whether or not he’s going to be able to sustain and be efficient.”

Tee Higgins is next man up for Laviska 

 

Tee Higgins plays for the Bengals.

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BIGH2001 said:

Shenault’s style of play will probably lead to a lot of injuries. 

If only we could run curls and slants to him so he can catch and go instead of always running that same dam play all season. Even go routes In Jacksonville he ran regular routes what’s the dam problem here.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DJ don’t want to play.. he knows the game plan for him sub-7 attempts his way (he gets 3:4, 37yds) ..

 

that kid seems worn out by the ineptitude of most of the last few seasons… even now that there some competence at the helm, we’re straight run heavy, denying that man the opportunity to prove his skill set…

 

he’s a peacock, he needs to fly….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, trucpfan said:

If only we could run curls and slants to him so he can catch and go instead of always running that same dam play all season. Even go routes In Jacksonville he ran regular routes what’s the dam problem here.

Mcadoo has no creativity in his offense. Shenault wasn’t here at the beginning of camp. Mcadoo finds one play that mostly works and just keeps running it over and over because he’s too lazy to try to figure out other ways that might move the ball with this player. “6 yards, sounds good enough to me.”  That being said, shenault definitely runs to the contact instead of away from it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it's strange that you still can't see where I'm coming from, and I guarantee you don't have more faith in him than I do.  You're looking at him in a vacuum, not about the team around him and the likely offensive game plans this season. We're going to be a run first team with 3 receiving options better than any of the other players on past rookie 1k seasons. If you can't understand that, then it's a you problem, not a me problem. Arizona's previous basketball coach, Sean Miller, used to do something at the first team meeting of every season and I think it's soooooooooo applicable to this situation. He'd have every player right down how many minutes/points they expected to average that season and then he'd add them up.  It would show that if they all hit those numbers, we'd score like 125 points a game and need to be playing 7 guys at a time to get their minutes. That's pretty much how you guys are putting your T-Mac expectations out there, looking solely at the player and what you think he should be able to do, not how the offense will operate as a whole. Every yard one player gets is one less yard someone else can get.  It sounds like I just have more faith in Thielen, XL, and Coker this year than most everyone else.  But a big reason for that faith is because of T-Mac and how much he'll open things up for the rest of them and Bryce being the type of QB to take the open easy passes than force it to his #1. As I've said, if any one of the following happens... Thielen ends the season sub 700 yards, XL or Coker end up sub 500 yards... Then yes, I will then shift my expectations for T-Mac's rookie year to be at least 1,000 yard season. But since I have faith in those other 3 having solid seasons, it tempers my expectations yardage totals for T-Mac this year, and this year alone.  I've also clearly stated many times that I think he's going to reach 10 TDs. If T-Mac ends the season with 800 yards and 10 TDs, while Thielen gets 900-1,000 and XL/Coker each get around 600, I don't see any world where that is a failure for a rookie season for T-Mac. Because again, we're talking about expectations, not what is possible.  So given the other WR options, I can't EXPECT T-Mac to get to the 1k mark, which is a far cry from me saying I don't think he can get there. Do you really not see the difference there?  
    • I don't recall anyone seeing this coming.  I mean, two seperate things for me.  I thought BB just might not work in college football because he is old grumpy man and college is about appealing to young kids.   So yeah, that could of gone great or horrible.  Coin flip.  This isn't that convo for me.  what we are witnessing right now play out.....this was never part of the disaster possibility/path discussed lol.  Really weird stuff.  Or maybe I missed the part where UNC hires a 20 year old "girlfriend" that apparently runs the Bill operation and before the season even starts is taking over more than just Bill but influence of the entire UNC operation.  That was her getting that official statement made today.  It was her sabotaging the Hard Knocks UNC show because she somehow wasn't the star.  Seems like elder abuse lol.  Only largely kidding.  You even got Charles Barkley saying he normally doesn't talk about personal lives of his friends but he might have to check in on Bill because this ain't normal stuff lol.  Anyway, it's entertaining.  Everything is a cartoon it seems these days.   
    • I think its strange how you were claiming this guy was the second coming of Mike Evans and you can't even get behind 1k yards? I guess I have more faith in him than you
×
×
  • Create New...