Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Kaye, Observer comment on Wilks support


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

 

They run mostly Cover 2 or Cover 3. They want to get pressure from the front 4. It's a stop the run on the way to the QB type rush. LBs are iffy, and the Secondary misses assignments all the time. It is getting better, but they were the worst to start with.

The Lions have a good offense, so I expect them to put some points on the board, which will hurt the Panthers because their ball control offense is not suited to play catch up and score lots of points.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

The Lions have a good offense, so I expect them to put some points on the board, which will hurt the Panthers because their ball control offense is not suited to play catch up and score lots of points.

 

It would be nice to have our full complement of CBs for this game.

 

But like I mentioned earlier. Our D is better than theirs. However, their O is better than ours.

 

It is going to be an interesting game for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

It would be nice to have our full complement of CBs for this game.

 

But like I mentioned earlier. Our D is better than theirs. However, their O is better than ours.

 

It is going to be an interesting game for sure.

I would imagine we will get outcoached.  Their OC is pretty good and ours is McAdoo.....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I would imagine we will get outcoached.  Their OC is pretty good and ours is McAdoo.....

 

Hence why I said their O is better than ours, but our D is better than theirs.

 

Their D is improving. But it was at or near the bottom almost all year. So improving, but still susceptible to big plays, and long drives. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/20/2022 at 11:47 AM, raleigh-panther said:

The very Panther thing to do is:

     beat Detroit. Lose to New Orleans 

That way, screw draft position and playoffs at the same time and still Hire Wilks 

the lions defense is susceptible to the run 

a veritable trifecta of Panther fandom 

So it was written, so shall it be done.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Hence why I said their O is better than ours, but our D is better than theirs.

 

Their D is improving. But it was at or near the bottom almost all year. So improving, but still susceptible to big plays, and long drives. 

Yeah I wasn’t arguing. Just adding information to the post. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I wasn’t arguing. Just adding information to the post. 

 

Sorry bout that. I guess this board has me on more of an edge than I realized. I wasn't trying to be rude. Hence is what the wife uses when she wants to make a point. So I guess I stole it from her, and threw it at you. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Panthera onca said:

Agreed, he needs to hire an outside consulting firm.

It is a huge choice that will effect my expectations with the new crew. It's hard for me to believe our current people are well situated to make a great hire if we don't. Maybe it's better than Tepper going it solo but not enough to be optimistic about to me. Who is going to lead the charge? The guy who traded too much for Sam? The guy who did CMC's deal to prove how smart he is? Steve Drummond, Hurney's protégé lol. Pat Stewart, the guy so good we had to go get Morgan to offset his and Fritter's misses in 2021? I am not impressed with any of that at this time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Sorry bout that. I guess this board has me on more of an edge than I realized. I wasn't trying to be rude. Hence is what the wife uses when she wants to make a point. So I guess I stole it from her, and threw it at you. lol

No worries.  It's hard to pick up tone and other things on a message board.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

It is a huge choice that will effect my expectations with the new crew. It's hard for me to believe our current people are well situated to make a great hire if we don't. Maybe it's better than Tepper going it solo but not enough to be optimistic about to me. Who is going to lead the charge? The guy who traded too much for Sam? The guy who did CMC's deal to prove how smart he is? Steve Drummond, Hurney's protégé lol. Pat Stewart, the guy so good we had to go get Morgan to offset his and Fritter's misses in 2021? I am not impressed with any of that at this time. 

McCaffrey's deal was done by Hurney.

And Morgan was Fitterer's choice. He was always going to be here. The two of them joined the Panthers the same year within a few months of each other.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

McCaffrey's deal was done by Hurney.

And Morgan was Fitterer's choice. He was always going to be here. The two of them joined the Panthers the same year within a few months of each other.

All the people I mentioned are Hurney people expect Fritterer. Hurney was the GM on the CMC deal but we had hired the rest expect Fritterer right? So they were part of the process I assume with Hurney as the head or did Hurney hire the cap guy and then not have him work on CMC's deal? That looks a lot like the Moore and Moton deals? 

Morgan is the only one I didn't mention because he hasn't done any bad that I have seen in his first year here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...