Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Darnold Props

TheCasillas

By TheCasillas,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

We need better pass catching tight ends and a shifty slot player. 

RD 1: Michael Mayer, TE - Notre Dame

RD 2(a): Best defensive front 7 player available

RD 2(b): Zay Flowers, WR - Boston College

Rock with Darnold/MC/3rd or later rookie QB in 2023 and if none emerge as a legitimate top 15 starter, push in all your chips for the 2024 QB class. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Actionman0z Veteran

Actionman0z

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

RD 1: Michael Mayer, TE - Notre Dame

RD 2(a): Best defensive front 7 player available

RD 2(b): Zay Flowers, WR - Boston College

Rock with Darnold/MC/3rd or later rookie QB in 2023 and if none emerge as a legitimate top 15 starter, push in all your chips for the 2024 QB class. 

I’m in. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Krovvy said:

I mean, again, we're talking about a singular statistic that at the end of the day has no real bearing on performance overall. Though if you're so fascinated by this, again singular, statistic I can say that in Darnold's career, year by year, his YPA is much lower than Teddy's, if that even matters to you.

You do realize that one poor performance and that average could return to the mean, right?

This place is amazing.

People are appreciating that our QB isn't killing us, but there's a handful of posters that simply won't let that be.

"No, you're wrong and here's why". 

Just shake your head at our ignorance and move on with your day, good lord.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

RD 1: Michael Mayer, TE - Notre Dame

RD 2(a): Best defensive front 7 player available

RD 2(b): Zay Flowers, WR - Boston College

Rock with Darnold/MC/3rd or later rookie QB in 2023 and if none emerge as a legitimate top 15 starter, push in all your chips for the 2024 QB class. 

Not taking a TE in the 1st round ever.. The positional value doesn’t fit.. If you’re not taking a QB, OT, pass rusher, or CB early in the 1st then trade down..

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

This place is amazing.

People are appreciating that our QB isn't killing us, but there's a handful of posters that simply won't let that be.

"No, you're wrong and here's why". 

Just shake your head at our ignorance and move on with your day, good lord.

This from the guy who still contended the trade was a great move even at the end of last season. You're either clinically insane or you like Darnold for other reasons.

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ECHornet Grand Master

ECHornet

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Not taking a TE in the 1st round ever.. The positional value doesn’t fit.. If you’re not taking a QB, OT, pass rusher, or CB early in the 1st then trade down..

I get it. I’ve seen many 1st rd TEs fail to meet expectations, but if you think there’s a Gronk or Kelce caliber talent, you would and should make that pick every time. 

Our biggest holes on offense are QB and TE, and if we’re picking where I think we will, the 1st round worthy QBs will be gone. I don’t mind drafting a project QB later in the draft, but I’d rather secure our other biggest need.

I’ve read Mayer is as close to Gronk potential at TE seen in a while. I’ve only watched two games of his and I believe it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Popular Post
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted (edited)

After the first 2 pages, this thread just becomes unbearable to read by anybody that is unbiased. 

Sam did play a good game today. Great?  Why the fug what he need to with our oline playing the way they are?  Is the running game helping? Well, no poo Sherlock.   The run game makes every QB's job easier. So stop throwing that out there as a qualifier.  

Sam still stepped up and made big plays today when his number was called.

Nobody is anointing him, so the anti Sam people can back off that poo too. 

Just acknowledge he is leading this team to victory.  That's what the QB get paid to do.  

Obviously,  the story of Sam, is not over yet, much to the dismay of his critics. 

While he hasn't been lighting up the league,  he's winning, and not turning the ball over.  damn, sounds like a QB to me. 

Next season is still next season. 

Is good to see Sam and the team doing well. I'll never understand the people who hate that poo. 

Edited by pantherclaw
  • Pie 9
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • PNW_PantherMan
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...