Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So the Titans giving up on Malik Willis already?


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm not a Corral booster, but it is fair to point out that some of the same folks saying we need to withhold judgment on Willis after multiple games played and started have already conclusively written off Corral based on a few series in preseason.

From what I’ve seen Corral isn’t getting written off due to potential as much as current situation. Was drafted by coach who is fired in the third round and has been on IR all year. It’s just going to be tough for him due to those circumstances. It’s why many mocks have us taking a QB and the Titans not drafting one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Cautionary tale of not selecting inaccurate QBs hoping that changes.  I am looking at you AR15

Looks like Willis was 62.4% completion rate in college. I think Bryce Young is in the 65% range and is considered one of the more accurate ones. To me it’s more to do with the system they run in college. Both Corral and Willis ran a RPO which was mostly a one read offense. It’s a big adjustment to go from that to a NFL offense. Bryce Young for example is running a NFL offense where he goes through progressions and makes reads.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

From what I’ve seen Corral isn’t getting written off due to potential as much as current situation. Was drafted by coach who is fired in the third round and has been on IR all year. It’s just going to be tough for him due to those circumstances. It’s why many mocks have us taking a QB and the Titans not drafting one.

Well Matt Rhule said anything that didn’t work out his hands where tied it was Fitt he didn’t know he didn’t have seven years he wanted to do good things but was vetoed by bad things nothing is his fault. 
 

And I have every reason to believe his words. 
 

Therefore Corral is a Fitt guy. Unless he balls out next year then he was a Rhule guy from the start. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Well Matt Rhule said anything that didn’t work out his hands where tied it was Fitt he didn’t know he didn’t have seven years he wanted to do good things but was vetoed by bad things nothing is his fault. 
 

And I have every reason to believe his words. 
 

Therefore Corral is a Fitt guy. Unless he balls out next year then he was a Rhule guy from the start. 

Oh Rhule how we will miss his antics....

 Even is Corral is a Fitt guy, the new HC is probably going to want his guy at the QB position.  Even if it's WIlks he will want to pick his QB.  One his major issues with the Cardinals was how they forced Rosen on him when he wanted to trade up for Allen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...