Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What's your offer to Chicago?


BrisbanePanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

If Young ends up being the #1 overall target for Houston, I would shudder to think what that would cost. Keep in mind the Texans stood their ground and got a massive haul from the Browns. I don't imagine that becomes easier with what they have now.

I actually think the Browns trades makes #1 cheaper than normal...still costly, but not unheard-of. Caserio seems to be on the hotseat. He needs players now and currently has #1 and #11. They are not a QB away. He may be the busiest GM leading to the draft, and getting the chance for more potential starters in 2023 may matter to him most. Some mocks have Levis at 1. He could get him at 8, and gain more Day 2 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've come to the point where I'm not trading picks for a college player who may or may not ever develop. I might trade some picks for a proven NFL player during the season when I can see how they are doing.

But man, trading picks away for the chance to get a Vince Young or an aging Russell Wilson... I think wiser teams stick to what they have in the draft and then spend most of their resources looking to pick up the right free agents in the offseason who can fill needs. Fitterer, seems to be getting better at that, especially if you look at our offensive line. 

How about we take some time to build a strong foundation without trading away tomorrow. Too many people are willing to trade for those magic beans...

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Varking said:

First this year and first and second next year. It’s not that big of a drop. If we make the playoffs and the positioning drops for us we will have to pony up more than that. 

Which has always been my problem with winning this year 

Sneaking into the playoffs is exciting/cool and all but man it’ll cost us come April and no thanks 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

We will need two goalies and Pyotr and Freddie are the best two we have. I love Raanta for what he has done but he is very clearly the 3rd best goalie on the squad.

You gotta roll with your best two guys, IMO. Unless there is some chemistry issue with him.

Availability is your best ability and Freddie is never available. He has also looked very pedestrian when healthy this year. Raanta is probably one of the better backups in the league and honestly does it matter. Our system and defense is a goalies best friend. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MHS 101:  Logic by MHS.  A course for people who pretend to be logical or need input from someone pretending to be logical.

You can argue--"I ain't giving up no first rounders for no QB!!!  Does the name Robert Griffindore III ring any bells? Mitchell Trubiskee?" 

However, is that worse than paying a veteran $50 million to come in and stink it up?  I mean, you could argue that Goff has outplayed Stafford.  You could argue that Russell Wilson has crippled the Denver team for a half decade.

Half of the first rounders tend to bust or underperform.  If you really like a QB in this draft, you go get him.  However, my problem is: I really don't like the top 2 QBs in the draft.

I would rather pay Minshew, draft a project like Matt Corral again, and develop players. 

I feel pretty good about the fact that last year, I mocked Brock Purdy to the Panthers a lot in the late rounds.  So I know what I am talking about here.

Herndon in round 2?  I know that he is old, but that means you get a mature QB on a first round contract.  I like the QB from Houston, "Name that" Tune.  I dunno. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrisbanePanther said:

I actually think the Browns trades makes #1 cheaper than normal...still costly, but not unheard-of. Caserio seems to be on the hotseat. He needs players now and currently has #1 and #11. They are not a QB away. He may be the busiest GM leading to the draft, and getting the chance for more potential starters in 2023 may matter to him most. Some mocks have Levis at 1. He could get him at 8, and gain more Day 2 picks.

Yeah, I mean I hate to break it to you but that is literally not how that works. The Texans just go exactly what they wanted, a clear shot at drafting anyone they want and the draft capital to build around a franchise QB for years to come.

To be honest, it might not only be the wildly expensive to trade up but the most expensive trade up in NFL history.

What they did was very, very, very smart when they were forced to lose their franchise QB. They blew it all up and now sit on a fuging gold mine of drafts picks. It's up to them to build it up but what they did to get there was very smart.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ncsfinest21 said:

Justin Fields is coming into his 3rd year and he showed promise. So Im not so sure they will go QB when they need more defensive players.

There is no chance Chicago is going QB. His own head coach called him the franchise a couple weeks ago and players around the league are praising Fields. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I've come to the point where I'm not trading picks for a college player who may or may not ever develop. I might trade some picks for a proven NFL player during the season when I can see how they are doing.

But man, trading picks away for the chance to get a Vince Young or an aging Russell Wilson... I think wiser teams stick to what they have in the draft and then spend most of their resources looking to pick up the right free agents in the offseason who can fill needs. Fitterer, seems to be getting better at that, especially if you look at our offensive line. 

How about we take some time to build a strong foundation without trading away tomorrow. Too many people are willing to trade for those magic beans...

There is no clear successful formula here. Stafford was viewed as an aging player that most thought was a loser. Yet the Rams reached the pinnacle in year one. Wilson was viewed as an elite player that cost a fortune and now looks like his career could be over.

You could trade up to get Pat Mahomes or you could trade up to get an oft injured Trey Lance.

So, the reality is that you just need to be committed to the move and make it. It might work out or it might not. If our FO is committed to trading up to get a QB, do it. If it fails, that sorts itself out because they will be unemployed in as a result.

That's the thing about taking that risk. You could get everything or nothing.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

MHS 101:  Logic by MHS.  A course for people who pretend to be logical or need input from someone pretending to be logical.

You can argue--"I ain't giving up no first rounders for no QB!!!  Does the name Robert Griffindore III ring any bells? Mitchell Trubiskee?" 

However, is that worse than paying a veteran $50 million to come in and stink it up?  I mean, you could argue that Goff has outplayed Stafford.  You could argue that Russell Wilson has crippled the Denver team for a half decade.

Half of the first rounders tend to bust or underperform.  If you really like a QB in this draft, you go get him.  However, my problem is: I really don't like the top 2 QBs in the draft.

I would rather pay Minshew, draft a project like Matt Corral again, and develop players. 

I feel pretty good about the fact that last year, I mocked Brock Purdy to the Panthers a lot in the late rounds.  So I know what I am talking about here.

Herndon in round 2?  I know that he is old, but that means you get a mature QB on a first round contract.  I like the QB from Houston, "Name that" Tune.  I dunno. 

Yeah, the problem with that strategy is that historically it rarely works. You might have some good teams but you won't win it all and you will rarely sustain success.

Doesn't mean we have to go for broke this offseason to get a franchise QB but if you want to keep yourself in purgatory, consistently banking on late round QB's is a really effective way to do it.

What you should do is keep cycling through backup drafted QB's, regardless of the starting QB status. That should happen every 1-3 years. At least that way you take enough cracks to maybe hit a winner and without stressing the talent level on the roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Yes...we won games with the easiest schedule left in the league and beating teams in a absolute crap division. Its nothing to brag about. 

We won some games lately against teams or are fighting for a wildcard.  Crap on the team all you want.  They definitely tripped up the first 6 games of the year, no doubt about that, but this team is a tale of two cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

There is no clear successful formula here. Stafford was viewed as an aging player that most thought was a loser. Yet the Rams reached the pinnacle in year one. Wilson was viewed as an elite player that cost a fortune and now looks like his career could be over.

You could trade up to get Pat Mahomes or you could trade up to get an oft injured Trey Lance.

So, the reality is that you just need to be committed to the move and make it. It might work out or it might not. If our FO is committed to trading up to get a QB, do it. If it fails, that sorts itself out because they will be unemployed in as a result.

This is pretty much the way I see it. At least it's trying. When you're rummaging around in the NFL's garbage bin trying to find a QB Like we have so far in the Tepper era, we've predictably found what you're mostly likely to find - garbage.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...