Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No Jim Harbaugh - Carolina focusing attention elsewhere

therealmjl

By therealmjl,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

PanthersATL Grand Master

PanthersATL

Posted
Posted

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

Being a leader and getting guys to play hard for him and scheming for another nfl team are 2 completely different things. I respect the gravitas he brings and he would bring us back to respectability but we have to do better.   And it’s not the asst coaches it’s his entire old school mindset.   We have already done it that way 2x now.   It’s not that the style doesn’t work it just doesn’t work enough.   

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

We don’t know what all was being discussed. We don’t even know 100% if anything is accurate at this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

We don’t know what all was being discussed. We don’t even know 100% if anything is accurate at this point. 

I don't know if those specifics are true, but It wouldn't shock me if Denver ownership was trying to make a big splash (same as Tepper did with his first hire).

I'd add that while we don't know what his desires/demands are, based on his general personality and what happened in Minnesota last year, it's not hard to figure that they're probably...substantial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherKyle Mentor

PantherKyle

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

if it's true that Harbaugh wanted 20m/year, a new GM, and full control?   I'm fine with Tepper walking away from that.

Wilks has proven he can coach this team and the players will work hard for him.  Other than not going for it on 4th and inches, fans really don't have much to honestly complain about what Wilks has been able to accomplish in the short tenure he's been in the role

 

How about not beating a team with a winning record and going 5-6? He’s not the long term answer. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Lobo Grand Master

The Lobo

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't know if those specifics are true, but It wouldn't shock me if Denver ownership was trying to make a big splash (same as Tepper did with his first hire).

I'd add that while we don't know what his desires/demands are, based on his general personality and what happened in Minnesota last year, it's not hard to figure that they're probably...substantial.

I mean Harbaugh is a big splash Rhule is not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      This draft is 2023 all over again, it's not hard to see. QB's who don't grade out as high first round prospects while at the same time, the following draft class looks to be loaded with elite QB prospects. Drafting a QB just because you need one (or making a bad trade to make said draft pick), when there isn't one worthy of that draft pick, is how you ruin franchises, just look at us right now.  
    • Anybodyhome
      Cellphones

      By Anybodyhome · Posted

      I upgraded to the S24+ a few weeks back. Very happy with it. 
    • tukafan21
      With the first pick, don't draft a QB? Draft a DE? C'mon!

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.   And yes, I've never said I'm not a T-Mac homer. But me being that doesn't change that he will be the highest graded offensive player in this year's draft, at a position we haven't been able to solve since we lost Smitty.  Taking him makes all the sense in the world, my bias aside.
×
×
  • Create New...