Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

We wouldn’t really have to trade for him, they could cut him a day or two after the super bowl and save tons of cap space 

Just a question do we have Adams, Jacobs and Warren because Carr couldn’t win with them right??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Nothing is guaranteed. We're all dealing in hypotheticals. We could hire Steichen and go 9-25 over the next two seasons and he'd be fired as well. 

What we're dealing with in reality is unicorns. The Huddle seems to chase them on damn near an annual basis.

"If we trade for Deshaun Watson, we're in the Super Bowl."

"If we bring Cam back, we're gonna start winning again."

"We're just a quarterback away from being contenders."

And the latest, "Just hire Sean Payton, give him the keys and prepare for Super Bowl glory."

All we got to do is get that one guy, and everything's gonna be fine.

Except it never is, not even for the team that gets "that guy" when we don't.

It's never going to be that simple, and people who think it is are dreaming.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, HPPantherzfan said:

We pick 9th, the best we are going to do is a developmental QB with a high ceiling, so, the best they could possibly so is the same.  More than likely, we would end trading something low to get Carr.  I would argue they have a coach who no one in their right mind would say is in the same stratosphere as Payton.  Again, in this scenario, we win

Daniel Jones pretty much said he'll explore free agency.

Lot's of people here hate on Daniel Jones but he never had any receivers or TEs of mention in NY.

Daniel Jones probably looks over here and sees DJ, Terrace, Tremble, Thomas and salivates all of better caliber than anyone he had in NY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

No it wasn’t.. Show me the Hesiman trophy winner and generational talent profile on Corral or Howell I’ll wait??

If you are going to be stubborn about this, then its probably not worth the debate.  However, let me ask this...

Where was Joe Burrow projected to be drafted in Jan 2018? The year before his Heisman season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

What we're dealing with in reality is unicorns. The Huddle seems to chase them on damn near an annual basis.

"If we trade for Deshaun Watson, we're in the Super Bowl."

"If we bring Cam back, we're gonna start winning again."

"We're just a quarterback away from being contenders."

And the latest, "Just hire Sean Payton, give him the keys and prepare for Super Bowl glory."

All we got to do is get that one guy, and everything's gonna be fine.

Except it never is, not even for the team that gets "that guy" when we don't.

It's never going to be that simple, and people who think it is are dreaming.

...you advocating to find the "next McVay" is also dealing in unicorns, is it not?

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

If you are going to be stubborn about this, then its probably not worth the debate.  However, let me ask this...

Where was Joe Burrow projected to be drafted in Jan 2018? The year before his Heisman season.

66 tds and the best college QB season ever changes that.. Again I’m waiting on you to produce any Scout, Analysts or media head that had Corral or Howell looked at in the same light as Williams or Mayes who are getting Luck, Lawrence comparisons..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

"Being reported", especially on Twitter means NOTHING. Joe Person's informed opinion that Dan and Fitt would lose their jobs is just that, an opinion. I know you love your "insider" scoops, and love to be the first to post Tweets on here ... but, dude ... relax. Let actual things happen. We'll all know when we all know ... and until then, what we think we know is more than likely BS.

John Ellis did sort of lightly suggest on the most recent Roar podcast that there is definitely some FO personnel nervousness over Sean Payton wanting to potentially clean house. Didn't mention any specific names, obviously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...