Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold had the 13th worst QB win in NFL history if we measured passer rating


ENC Pantherfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/lowest-passer-rating-in-a-win-in-nfl-history#:~:text=6 teams are tied for,Giants on November 14%2C 1976.

 

Anyone wondering if this is the worse QB win in NFL history it is not. A 0.0 rating in a win has been done 8 times prior, however this is the worst QB win as far as passer since Rex Grossman achieved a 1.3 QB rating on December 3rd 2006 vs the Vikings. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An ugly win counts just as much as a pretty win. Who cares what it looks like? A WIN is a WIN. 

 

I just don't understand this. Who spends 4 hours watching their favorite team win a football game, then complains about how it was won?

 

We beat a Divisional rival, at their place, and only lost 1 spot in the draft doing so. Triple win.

 

 

Edited by Gerry Green
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

An ugly win counts just as much as a pretty win. Who cares what it looks like? A WIN is a WIN. 

 

I just don't understand this. Who spends 4 hours watching their favorite team win a football game, then complains about how it was won?

 

We beat a Divisional rival, at their place, and only lost 1 spot in the draft doing so. Triple win.

 

 

James Franco Reaction GIFHere?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

By every conceivable metric Sam Darnold is not an NFL starting quality quarterback. It's plain to see in his career that he doesn't have it. The only people supporting him now are stubborn fans who dug their hole with blind support.

A lot of these same fans for some reason really hated Cam Newton.

 

There is a whole lot of wrong in this post. You'd be hard pressed to find many ppl who want to resign Sam. But it must be fun throwing that out there.

 

As to the Cam thing. Who you fishing for with that bait?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

There is a whole lot of wrong in this post. You'd be hard pressed to find many ppl who want to resign Sam. But it must be fun throwing that out there.

 

As to the Cam thing. Who you fishing for with that bait?

Looks like my post hit home.

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, frankw said:

Remember when we had an MVP and even he couldn't do enough to convince some people he was a franchise quarterback? Standards around here are now below the Earth's crust. We desperately need a real quarterback and an enema for this fanbase.

 

You really do have no compunction at all about insulting, basically, the whole fanbase do you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

By every conceivable metric Sam Darnold is not an NFL starting quality quarterback. It's plain to see in his career that he doesn't have it. The only people supporting him now are stubborn fans who dug their hole with blind support.

A lot of these same fans for some reason really hated Cam Newton.

"Every conceivable metric" - except the ones from this season.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And before yesterday he had a string of games that made him one of the best QBs in the league. People have bad games. He should not be our starter ... but damn, some of you just can't let it go. It's like you're trying to prove Sam is bad. We know he is. Or, you want to stand on your soap box and go, SEE I TOLD YOU! But you're speaking to like ... 1-3 guys on here lol.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...