Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much FAITH in Tepper do you have to get the coach right?


How much FAITH in Tepper do you have to get the coach right?  

93 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • I 100% believe that he will get it right
      1
    • I am very optimistic that he will get it right
      9
    • I am slightly optimistic
      20
    • It could go either way (neutral option)
      12
    • Slightly Pessimistic
      11
    • Very pessimistic but there is a ray of hope
      22
    • I 100% believe that he will fug this all up
      18


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

I think we have a much better pool if candidates than last time. Put them all in a dartboard and blindfold him and he could hit any of them and still be a pretty good upgrade from Rhule.

I'd actually be ok with any of them. No hard feelings against any of the choices.... except maybe Kellen Moore.

We have smarter people making the pool.

4 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

TBH, yes. Even if he does something that the Huddle generally agrees with, continuing to lose/fail will be his fault. 

Was Rhule really that popular a choice last time around?

I remember maybe a few people liking him but I don't think it was anything close to a majority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean ... it's up to the coach. Had Rhule known what he was doing he'd still be here. Tepper can't read minds or see inside a candidates head. On paper Rhule seemed good. He was not in the end. So on paper, yeah ... he can easily pick a "good one". But it'll either pan out or it won't.

Edited by Brooklyn 3.0
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I remember maybe a few people liking him but I don't think it was anything close to a majority.

considering the other options were Garrett, McCarthy, McDaniels

Majority was between either Stefanski or Matt Rhule

I would post the threads but this place fuging sucks at keeping threads from years ago

But you can easily go read the general fan consensus about the pick on the Panthers subreddit, and it all seems very positive. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. But you do understand that there is no such thing as not signing free agents, right? That's what I mean. So make some good free agency moves and do well in the draft. That's step one. If you can't accomplish that, then this will just keep getting worse.
    • Sweet jebus this is idiotic Yes, overall team success in this league, you need a good QB, but beyond just that painfully obvious fact, let's get into the rest of the stupid in there......... First things first, you say.. "if we need a good QB for him to have success, then why are you drafting that player with the #1 pick" Show me one time I've ever said we would need a good QB for T-Mac himself to have success... you can't, because I never have.  I think you're referring to the "he's bad enough that we then have a Top 5 pick to target a QB" part of my post, which is very clearly talking about said QB, not T-Mac.  The other way to interpret that is just overall team success, which again, wouldn't be anything about T-Mac or his ability to impact the offense or overall team wins and losses. I'm quite sure I could do this with a number of teams over the years, but I don't want to spend the time to do multiple, so I'll keep it to just the 2023 Vikings right now since you wanted to use Jefferson as your example....... The Vikings went 3-6 after Cousins went down last year.  And two of those wins came before Jefferson even came back from his own injury, they were 1-4 in the final 5 weeks after Jefferson came back. In those 5 games, Jefferson had 31 catches, 503 yards, and 2 TDs Having the WR you specifically called out didn't help them go better than 1-4 with a bad QB, even though he still put up a great stat line for that time period either.  It also didn't make that QB good enough to where they then went out and brought in TWO new QB's this year to replace Doubs and Mullens who started down the stretch for them last year. And that's with 4th year Jefferson, not a rookie that T-Mac would be If you expect a WR getting drafted #1 overall to be the player to turn a franchise as bad as we are around in 1 season, make whatever QB we're able to put in there be successful, and lead us to a solid season, then you are literally insane. We are AWFUL, we have a few young guys who could turn into great players, but we are so far from being a good team, that there isn't any player we could draft next year that is going to change that in 2025.
×
×
  • Create New...