Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“I don’t think they draft a QB”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

I never thought Corral was the answer. I wanted him to start to see if he was worth developing or if he could be the tank commander. It was a win-win to me.

This is what I saw back in August. I can't recall anyone thinking he was the answer. We already know Darnold isn't the answer. So if things aren't working out with Baker, throw Corral out there and see what he's got. Then the durability concerns entered the picture and ended that.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, ncfan said:

Will Kunkle who covers the Panthers just said on WFNZ 

“I don’t think the Panthers draft a QB”  

“They don’t like any of the QBs that are expected to be available.  And do not want to move up for one of these guys.”

 

i cant stress enough that will kunkle has absolutely no idea who they like. also in the slight chance this is correct, it will be just another wasted season. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ECHornet said:

Cheers for the honesty and effort. I botched the years though. I was curious of the poster’s opinion on the combined 2023 and 2024 classes. 
 

Since so many are scoffing at the idea of waiting until next year to draft a 1st round QB, I thought that would be interesting to see. I’d go…

1. Williams 2024

2. Maye 2024

3. Young

4. Stroud 2024??

5. Rattler 2024

6. Penix Jr 2024

7. AR

8. Daniels 2024

9. Levis

10. Ewers 2024

In discussion for top 10- 15McKee, Hooker, Bennett, Rising 2024, Ward 2024, McCarthy 2024, Nix 2024

Easy to see why I think 2024 is a great year to target a 1st round QB.

 

Can’t keep kicking the can down the road. 2023 was the year to target QBs until Rattler poo the bed and so forth it’s hard to bank on a class. If our Front Office identifies a guy that they believe has a top 20 draft grade and has the tools and can get him pull the trigger. I’m not saying anyone is Mahommes or Allen but this logic means you’d pass on them if a Trevor Lawrence was coming out the following year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Can’t keep kicking the can down the road. 2023 was the year to target QBs until Rattler poo the bed and so forth it’s hard to bank on a class. If our Front Office identifies a guy that they believe has a top 20 draft grade and has the tools and can get him pull the trigger. I’m not saying anyone is Mahommes or Allen but this logic means you’d pass on them if a Trevor Lawrence was coming out the following year 

I’d give two 2023 QBs a top 20 grade; Young and Stroud. Stroud may not even declare. I’d consider taking a flier on AR if we can trade back and acquire a 2024 1st OR keep #9 and trade up into late 1st. Levis is more of a late second to third rounder. He’s another Kenny Pickett imo. 
 

Next year is much deeper and has more premier talent at the top. Especially if Stroud stays in school. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I’d give two 2023 QBs a top 20 grade; Young and Stroud. Stroud may not even declare. I’d consider taking a flier on AR if we can trade back and acquire a 2024 1st OR keep #9 and trade up into late 1st. Levis is more of a late second to third rounder. He’s another Kenny Pickett imo. 
 

Next year is much deeper and has more premier talent at the top. Especially if Stroud stays in school. 

Depending how Levis does behind closed doors with all his interviews I’d wouldn’t be upset adding him at 9 if the team has the grade on him. Big strong mobile cannon to be honest if Wilks gets the job I think he would favour him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Mr Mojo Risin said:

No one knows how these kids will do in the NFL. Playing QB is more than just stats and arm talent. A lot of it goes into the make up of the person and how dedicated they are to their craft. You don't find that out by simply looking at stat sheets and watching tape. Way too early to tell if they are worth drafting or not

Hence the 1% chance...not too early though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

That is the exact definition of "reaching for need".

Teams screw themselves massively doing that.

How long have the Panthers gone without having a winning record, let alone making the playoffs again?

You need to take some risks at some point, Scot. 

 

Unless you want Sam to be re-signed and we just punt the next season and hope we suck badly enough to be in the Top 5 next time to grab a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

How long have the Panthers gone without having a winning record, let alone making the playoffs again?

You need to take some risks at some point, Scot. 

Unless you want Sam to be re-signed and we just punt the next season and hope we suck badly enough to be in the Top 5 next time to grab a QB.

No, you don't need to take one just to take one.

That's how you wind up with a jimmy Clausen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GOAT said:

or take one in the late rounds like Purdy 

Have to admit that Purdy is making this a very valid point.

However, it all depends on the SYSTEM being used.

Kyle Shannahan just knows how to utilize whatever QB he has.

We don't have anyone like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I don't follow college so I go by what I see in articles and highlights and forums. So I have no idea. Not gonna speak on a subject I know little about. Just noticing the trend of the last 3 years we've been looking for a QB.

Looks like a QB heavy draft>College Season Begins>College QBs play like College QBs>No QB in this draft is worth a top 10 pick except one or two guys>Panthers win too many games to draft 1 or 2 but not enough to contend>Panthers don't draft a QB. Rinse and repeat ad nauseum.

As I said, I guarantee most of the QBs coming out next year over half will be declared not first round material. Because it happens every year. That is why I am not gonna say Drake Maye, for example, is first round material. Howell was first round material until his last year in college and that year nose dived his draft stock into the 5th round. 

Hope you don't mind the edit.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The problem that Bryce faces is his lack of prototypical tools.  He's not the tall, strong armed mobile QB that tends to get drafted first overall.  His game is not played in underwear on a practice field.  His best asset are his intangibles.  They aren't sexy like a cannon arm or a fast 40 yard dash. OK, so we took the lesser athlete.  Bryce put up a pretty bad season with a bad team around him.  The coaching staff, for all it's platitudes, sucked.  They made sure Bryce could run a huddle, but didn't help him get better as a player.  Bad choice. Compare that to what other teams did to their Rookies:  they put them in position to succeed with better personnel and better play calling.  Sure, there are physical differences which are going to affect the outcomes, but you can't change it. Am I trying to ride to the defense of Bryce?  Only a little.  He's my favorite team's QB, and I believe in him.  Now, he's got this year to show that he's "the No. 1 for a reason" (Thanks CJ Stroud).  Will he, won't he?  I don't know at all.  That's on the D&D crew to put Bryce is position to play well.  Running the ball is going to make things a lot easier for Bryce.  Does that discount his success if he plays well?  For some of y'all it will.  Some of y'all just don't like Bryce, like he stole you DoorDash or something. Regardless, let's see what happens in 2024.  If Bryce stinks it up, then we're going back to the QB well again.  
    • we may think we know, but we don't know. we won't know what effect upgrades on the OL, coaching staff, and WR room will have. we don't know what scheme canales is going to put together. we don't know a lot of things.  that's why we play the games...to see what shakes out. plenty of reasons to think Bryce is limited this year...again. Plenty of reasons to see an improvement in his play. 
    • He did not elevate the players around him, but they de-elevated their QB.  A QB like Bryce needs a system, a strong OL, a Running game, and WRs that can get open.  Call him a manager at best, but so is a point guard.  That is all we should need.  He is smart enough to grow into a very effective player.  I once saw a Coach talking about the OL--i forget who it was Schottenheimer comes to mind--and he said, you can succeed if you have one weak link on the OL.  If you get 2 weak links, success comes 10x harder.  If you get three weak links, your season is over.  Your QB is injured, and you are unemployed (paraphrasing).  I would say that we had 4 weak links (Icky does not get a pass) and a RB who was not good at pass blocking. I am not saying the Bryce is the answer at QB--but I am saying we don't know yet. I know QBs (college) and when the OL sucks, they collapse mentally over time.  That is what we saw--a QB who had never played without the advantage.
×
×
  • Create New...