Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers in violation of NFL rules regarding their search for a permanent head coach, multiple sources tell CBS Sports.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, MechaZain said:

You notice that your colleague Mary is wearing a well fitting pair of denim pants. Which of the following statements are an appropriate response? (Mark all that apply.)

A.) "Show me how you wiggle to get those jeans up."

B.) "I bet you lay down on your bed to fit in those jeans."

C.) "Did you step into those jeans or did you have to jump into them?"

D.) None of the above

sweating key and peele GIF

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Cullenator said:

This thread is really revealing.  Full of assumptions, hyperbole, misogyny, and casual racism.

 

Well done Huddle!

 

 

There's a kinds of " -isms" in this thread. It appears that a lot of folks missed their unconscious bias training courses.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarHeel said:

I’m an advocate for Wilks earning the HC position regardless of his skin color so not sure what you’re getting at.

 

I am generally not a fan of people being handed or stripped of opportunities simply based on the color of their skin. Character and resume should be the standard. If that makes me racist then call me whatever you like.

That last part should be the baseline for everyone, and that’s what these trainings are for. There’s a large large swath of people who don’t quite grasp that concept, and for the rest of us, these trainings are an easy, mundane, refresher to easily knock out then. Current training effectiveness is definitely debatable, but maybe that’s why they came out with this new program for NFL higher ups, to try Sand make ‘em more effective. 
 

Either way, thems the rules and corporate entities should be knowledgeable of them and should be compliant of them. Hopefully it’s not a big punishment, and Nicole just simply does what she has to do and we all move on. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You guys are just going to have to accept the fact that Dan Morgan is a mid GM best case scenario currently. I used to have people get very belligerent over defending Scott Fitterer too. And that's not hyperbole. People used to go to bat for that guy like he was blood related. We have a truckload invested in the OL and what do we have to show for it? The whole unit is already banged up including one of our big signings. Even without all that the group has largely take a step back from last year in pass protection. Then you get to the QB room and there's only two conclusions you can make about Dan Morgan. Either he deliberately ignored it two years in a row on his own accord or he took orders from Tepper to do so. Either scenario says he's not fit to be an NFL GM.
    • Frank, ceding control of the defense in no way verifies that Tepper told Canales to bench Young.    It certainly buttresses the idea that Canales would need permission to bench him but that is as far as you can take it.    After that it is pure speculation and it doesn’t make sense. 
    • Uhh, okay yes that happened. I didn’t like the pick either I am a 3rd or later RB guy. Always. Actually hated the CMC pick too. Hated the Stewart pick.  No one wants to talk about trading the #39 in that draft and what he did with that.  Got #52, #155, and the Rams 2025 2nd to boot.   The 52 and 155 plus our 142 5th rounder to go up for a Brooks Everyone wants to forget about the 2025 2nd for that Rams trade  which was used to move up for Scourton.  That Rams trade down was a great deal for us.     
×
×
  • Create New...