Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching Interview Thread IV: A New Hope


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

General Excitement.

Rivera was a great candidate with a track record of success at multiple stops leading Defenses to top 5 finishes multiple times. 

I think he was in the top 2 in terms of who the fanbase wanted between him and Harbaugh, and even many Harbaugh stans were fine with the hire as a consolation prize. 

We could have gotten Harbaugh? Man Harbaugh with rookie Cam make me salivate. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, rayzor said:

i think any of the people we've got lined up for 2nd interviews are an upgrade over the past couple HCs. get wilks teamed up with a good OC and he's definitely better than rivera. 

i see wilks as the floor for this group of prospects 

……snip….

17 minutes ago, rayzor said:

wilks has the players. reich would win them over easily. 

i just kind of like the idea of having a guy that doesn't need a learning curve as a HC and if that guy is an offensive guy with a good bit of success, especially in less than ideal situations, then bring him in. 

 


I think Steve Wilks has through the roof potential as boss of a football team. IMO his leadership is the best ever in Panthers history (such as it is). He was just outstanding. 

I am okay with Reich, was always open to him. He is one of the few they could get with bona fides in training quarterbacks, he has been a head coach. Checks the boxes. 

But keeping Wilks as DC is something that would be fraught with potential division, that could undermine a HC. I think both guys are mature enough and smart enough to not let that be a thing between them, but it is a hot potato waiting to happen.

Besides, I really think Wilks is a better HC than a DC, just eyeball and memory.  

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

For people who were here during the Rivera hiring. 
What was everyone’s opinion before Rivera got hired? 
I know Richardson wanted an offensive coordinator HC but he was letting Hurney lead the hiring and went along with the Rivera hiring. 
Was it excitement or disappointment?

If I recall I was indifferent to it much like I am with this one and others in the past. It is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

For people who were here during the Rivera hiring. 
What was everyone’s opinion before Rivera got hired? 
I know Richardson wanted an offensive coordinator HC but he was letting Hurney lead the hiring and went along with the Rivera hiring. 
Was it excitement or disappointment?

He was seen almost universally as a great hire.  The only skepticism was because he had interviewed for YEARS and never got the job.  But at the time I don't recall any Panthers fans being disappointed.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stratocatter said:

……snip….


I think Steve Wilks has through the roof potential as boss of a football team. IMO his leadership is the best ever in Panthers history (such as it is). He was just outstanding. 

I am okay with Reich, was always open to him. He is one of the few they could get with bona fides in training quarterbacks, he has been a head coach. Checks the boxes. 

But keeping Wilks as DC is something that would be fraught with potential division, that could undermine a HC. I think both guys are mature enough and smart enough to not let that be a thing between them, but it is a hot potato waiting to happen.

Besides, I really think Wilks is a better HC than a DC, just eyeball and memory.  

 

 being a leader doesnt make you a great football coach

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

We could have gotten Harbaugh? Man Harbaugh with rookie Cam make me salivate. 

I don't think we talked to Harbaugh.  The only Harbaugh/Panthers affiliation that I can recall is people wanting to pair Harbaugh and Luck together.  That had a real possibility... if Luck had came out of school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Reich HC/Wilks DC - would we still receive two third round compensation picks if Wilks chooses to go elsewhere as DC (i.e., Falcons)? I'm unsure if the interim label changes that.

Gonna need to change the defensive entirely to make Wilks scheme work. He relies on blitzing and his DBs picking up the slack. 
We saw in 2017 the best and worst of the scheme. 
When it worked it really worked. When it didn’t you got the first Saints game, well pretty much every Saints game in 2017. 
Our passing defense was really bad. But we had a ton of sacks. Six of one, half dozen of the other I guess. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Things like this happen everyday. We live in a social media driven society where loyalty is a foreign concept.
    • If you draft a guy who is healthy and has no concerns about that whatsoever and he goes out and tears his ACL in his first few games in the regular season on a physical play that's a freak accident. But when you trade up to draft an RB who is already rehabbing from a recent ACL tear and he spends the next several months continuing his rehab only to tear the same ACL again after less than a handful of regular season carries in a non contact circumstance that is no freak accident. That is a textbook example of why you do not do what we did. Particularly for what is now a plug and play position. And when you have the highest paid OL in the league over the next two years. None of that makes any logical sense. Legitimately it is and was some Scott Fitterer type foolishness. Now as for XL. The guy has not been committed to his craft. I think anyone with eyes on the situation can and would recognize that. However the warning signs were there. One season of legit production raw prospect that we knew would take time to develop etc. But Morgan and Bryce Young's own father were very high on him. I think in some capacity the reality of our limitation at QB is entering into the equation. Even TMac got a lot of flak over the course of his rookie season for not being able to haul in all of Bryce's passes. At the end of the day our fourth year QB also needs to do his part to maximize the talent we have available. As far as this year. Again. WR round 1 boils down to where are we going to get the touches for the rookie? That would require eating into not only our 8th overall picks touches but also our #2 WR whom oh yeah by the way was UNDRAFTED. I am happy to discuss WR prospects here. I was thrilled we invested what we did last year in TMac because it needed to be done and it made sense from all angles. But nowhere is it written in stone that you cannot draft a good or great WR outside of the first round. Except in the Panthers building apparently. That is not a good reflection on our scouts and front office let me tell ya. Because there's no way on this earth we are going to get back to relevancy and legitimate contender status if we can't pick some gems in the later rounds. Simple and plain.
×
×
  • Create New...