Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you trust Reich to find us (and develop) a franchise QB?


t96
 Share

Do you trust Reich to find us (and develop) a franchise QB?  

164 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you trust Reich to find us (and develop) a franchise QB?



Recommended Posts

Develop? Hell yeah. Find? Everyone that doesn't have one is trying to find one.

The problem is availability. They just don't drop out the sky like rain you know.  That takes more eyes as there has to be more people involved to help with sifting through the available options. It's just not that easy to say find one. It takes just as much luck as it does skill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Develop? Hell yeah. Find? Everyone that doesn't have one is trying to find one.

The problem is availability. They just don't drop out the sky like rain you know.  That takes more eyes as there has to be more people involved to help with sifting through the available options. It's just not that easy to say find one. It takes just as much luck as it does skill.

What say thee if Carson Wertz is cut and is willing to take a "rebuild my resume" cheap deal with the panthers?........what say thee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AggieLean said:

Yea, I think Stroud will be available around those picks. I think Levis and Young will be the first QBs off the board, but Stroud will not be available at 9.

Im with you on your first point. I was fine doing what we had to do(lose) to secure a top 5 pick. 

Stroud is going #1.  Thinking otherwise is ridiculous.  If he doesn’t go #1 that means Young went #1 and he goes 2.  It’s happening.  I don’t buy Levis above either guy.

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of you need to get over the thinking that Reich was brought to get a veteran QB.. 

The team is focused on getting a young QB.. 

If they were focused on a vet they would have hired Wilks because they wouldn’t need a person who can develop a QB right??

Last the Colts were in a different situation and the GM had more power there then the coach… They were way further along and thought they were a QB away from being a title contender.. And weren’t interested in rebuilding and developing a drafted young QB..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Some of you need to get over the thinking that Reich was brought to get a veteran QB.. 

The team is focused on getting a young QB.. 

If they were focused on a vet they would have hired Wilks because they wouldn’t need a person who can develop a QB right??

Last the Colts were in a different situation and the GM had more power there then the coach… They were way further along and thought they were a QB away from being a title contender.. And weren’t interested in rebuilding and developing a drafted young QB..

They were also interested in getting a young offensive mind. We see how that went. Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what does it mean that we just brought back Eason when we already had Corral on the roster? Drafted by the Colts, maybe just a coincidence/guy to help speed up the learning process for whoever else we have come in? I imagine we'll start off with 4 QB's again but have a clearer idea of starter instead of that disaster of a competition last year. At the least Reich should be able to identify who is grasping the system pretty early on in the process. He switched things up differently for Rivers and Wentz so he's not completely stuck in his ways unlike McAdoo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AggieLean said:

Yea, I think Stroud will be available around those picks. I think Levis and Young will be the first QBs off the board, but Stroud will not be available at 9.

Im with you on your first point. I was fine doing what we had to do(lose) to secure a top 5 pick. 

Eh...im just not as confident in that as yall are. Im not convinced Levis will be that highly valued. I think Stroud will be the top QB all said and done or maybe bryce.  Im just settling with the fact we would have to trade up all the way to one.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

So what does it mean that we just brought back Eason when we already had Corral on the roster? Drafted by the Colts, maybe just a coincidence/guy to help speed up the learning process for whoever else we have come in? I imagine we'll start off with 4 QB's again but have a clearer idea of starter instead of that disaster of a competition last year. At the least Reich should be able to identify who is grasping the system pretty early on in the process. He switched things up differently for Rivers and Wentz so he's not completely stuck in his ways unlike McAdoo

It means nothing. Eason can be cut at any time. His only hope is to stick around long enough to be a camp arm. After the rest of the staff is in place the focus will turn to the draft.  Corral is the only current qb that will most likely be in the qb room next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Bleacher Report trade and mock has us trading to 9 and picking SG Brayden Burries Charlotte Hornets recieve: Kyrie Irving and No. 9 pick Dallas Mavericks receive: LaMelo Ball, No. 14 pick and No. 18 pick The Hornets just finished their sixth season with Ball. It was only their second with a winning record, their sixth without a playoff trip and the sixth in which someone else paced them in win shares (Kon Knueppel this time around). While they'd surely like to keep building on their second-half momentum, maybe they're just unconvinced that Ball can lead a winning team. Maybe they credit that stretch run less to him and more to the addition of Knueppel, the ascension of Brandon Miller and some out-of-nowhere gains on the defensive end.   Charlotte should be dreaming big right now, and perhaps it believes a steadier hand at point guard is needed to realize that. Or maybe it feels it needs a little more time to bring everything together and thinks that task would be simpler without Ball's money on the books and with a top-10 pick in a loaded draft instead of two selections in the mid-teens.   Either way, this shakeup works. Short-term, a healthy Irving should be far easier to follow than Ball. You may not always know if Irving is playing, but you know what you'll get if he does: elite shotmaking, all-time handles, offensive ingenuity and the ability to work both on and off the ball. He could show this young roster what's required to win for a year or two (he has a $42.4 million player option for 2027-28) or even stick around longer if the partnership proves especially fruitful.   The Hornets also add a building block in Burries, who offers both plug-and-play polish and flashes of shot-creation that hint at star potential. In short, they could better their chances of winning both now and in the future while collecting both the best player in the trade and the highest draft pic
    • I'd hire him in a heartbeat. Hell if he wanted the job, I'd have Canales packing his poo right now and I don't dislike Canales. It's just that firing a 106-58 coach is crazy work. That's a 65% winning percentage. That's the equivalent of averaging 11 wins a season. That's incomprehensible for a fanbase That's never experienced back to back winning seaons.
×
×
  • Create New...