Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers land Evero as DC


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, mccjeff said:

Love this quote from it…

“You’ve got to affect the quarterback,” Evero said. “If you can’t get there with four, you’ve got to bring five, and if you can’t get there with five you’ve got to bring six. That’s my philosophy (on pressure).”

No more getting carved up by the Trubisky's of the world. Those guys are supposed to be folding under pressure, not dinking and dunking on a prevent defense in the 1st quarter

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Ugh, was just looking at that new rule, he might be TOO good of a hire for us to take advantage of it lol.

The coach needs to be a DC/OC for you for 2 years before getting a HC job for you to get the draft picks, so if he gets an HC job next year, we get nothing unfortunately.

Can't we sign him for a 2 year deal and not give him permission to interview?  Though it would probably cause a riff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Can't we sign him for a 2 year deal and not give him permission to interview?  Though it would probably cause a riff. 

No way you can prevent a coach from being able to interview for a "better" position, and even if you could you would never even bring it up when you are trying to land the best DC available in Evero.

This is a GREAT get for the Panthers!

Hope springs eternal!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UNCrules2187 said:

One of the big positives that led Evero to taking this job was apparently the ability to build his own staff on the defensive side of the ball. I wouldn't be surprised to see some folks from Denver join him. Also given Capers was a senior defensive assistant on Denver's staff last season and his ties to the franchise, wouldn't be surprised to see him come back here in that same role.

We have alot of exciting young talent on this team, defensively.  I would assume he is going to have alot of fun utilizing them.  

If we somehow get the QB position straight we might actually be a team to talk about next season.  Pull a 2021 Cincinnati.  Worst to First. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

No more getting carved up by the Trubisky's of the world. Those guys are supposed to be folding under pressure, not dinking and dunking on a prevent defense in the 1st quarter

Still can’t believe we lost to a Trubisky-led Steelers at home. But I digress - happier times ahead!

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

Still can’t believe we lost to a Trubisky-led Steelers at home. But I digress - happier times ahead!

Not to be a Debbie downer but the Broncos did get beat by a Mayfield led offense badly . 2 passing TD’s, 3 more rushing and 3 FG’s. 44 total offensive points.

We also beat them with Darnold at the helm last year too!

I have read multiple articles and seen just about every interview and press conference featuring Evero. There’s certainly reasons to be excited and the fact that he was interviewed for every H.C opening counts for something.

I’m very hopeful that games like that were more of a reflection of the broncos lack of talent on defense, more so than on his coaching or play calling.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Or offensive schemes, or...well, anything 😕

Tepper hires the coaches, does he not? Tepper owns the team, right? Yes and yes? Then yeah, he does have some input in the schemes being run. If the team feels like it can work, great. I just don't see how you plug the holes you've now created on defense and reserve the possibility to trade up and get a QB, as has been suspected here. 

You're likely going to have to go with Richardson, which I'm cool with. But then you're taking a 0 tech, a 3 tech 3-4 type end, and probably another edge rusher who can set the edge on the first two downs. Whereas if you stuck with a 4-3 you're taking BPA.

So this is a lot bigger deal than people here are understanding. Perhaps the blinders will come off in September. Or maybe you guys don't remember 2019 when we were changing back to a 3-4 scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, panther4life said:

Not to be a Debbie downer but the Broncos did get beat by a Mayfield led offense badly . 2 passing TD’s, 3 more rushing and 3 FG’s. 44 total offensive points.

We also beat them with Darnold at the helm last year too!

I have read multiple articles and seen just about every interview and press conference featuring Evero. There’s certainly reasons to be excited and the fact that he was interviewed for every H.C opening counts for something.

I’m very hopeful that games like that were more of a reflection of the broncos lack of talent on defense, more so than on his coaching or play calling.

 

 

I see you didn’t watch Denver and Russell W this year he was he threw three picks that game and the backup qb played threw another pick. You want your defense to pitch a shut out with four different change of possession plays. That’s just one game Russell did that all year to his team and the D held it down.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Tepper hires the coaches, does he not? Tepper owns the team, right? Yes and yes? Then yeah, he does have some input in the schemes being run. If the team feels like it can work, great. I just don't see how you plug the holes you've now created on defense and reserve the possibility to trade up and get a QB, as has been suspected here. 

You're likely going to have to go with Richardson, which I'm cool with. But then you're taking a 0 tech, a 3 tech 3-4 type end, and probably another edge rusher who can set the edge on the first two downs. Whereas if you stuck with a 4-3 you're taking BPA.

So this is a lot bigger deal than people here are understanding. Perhaps the blinders will come off in September. Or maybe you guys don't remember 2019 when we were changing back to a 3-4 scheme.

Per Albert Breer, when the time came to take a poll among the search committee on who was the preferred head coach candidate, Tepper abstained; specifically because he didn't want to influence anybody else's vote.

So no, It's not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

I see you didn’t watch Denver and Russell W this year he was he threw three picks that game and the backup qb played threw another pick. You want your defense to pitch a shut out with four different change of possession plays. That’s just one game Russell did that all year to his team and the D held it down.

I didn’t watch it. I’m just stating facts.

The Rams offense put 44 points, 388 yard of offense, 14 passing 1st downs. Over 9 total drives.

They also had drives that included going ,60,75 and 90 yards for TD’s

Plus 60 and 68 yard drives for FG’s.

Thats still 27 points where they earned all of it.  

1 of those 4 picks you mentioned was returned for a TD, so did nothing for field position to help the rams, another was a touchback.

The other 17 of the 44 points that offense put up on them were still earned and saw next to 0 resistance by the broncos Defense.

 

Edited by panther4life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...