Yes please

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

I'm never willing to say 'never' when it comes to NFL teams, especially when they're hunting QBs. I'd be loathe to give up a haul though - just don't see the talent this year for that. 

The bears would NEVER go from 1 to 9 for that weak of a haul

[mrcompletely11]

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I found it previous years, I can't find a trade chart that shows the value of future picks.

Bears 1st is - 3000 points

Our first, 3rd, and 4th - is just 1546 points 

Just applying mid round value (16th) to the 2023 1st and 3rd doesn't get you to 3000

He breaks it down here

 

https://theriotreport.com/what-would-it-cost-for-panthers-to-move-into-the-top-3/

Edited February 16, 2023 by mrcompletely11

[panthers55]

25 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

From 12 to 3 cost 3 1sts. No way 9 to 1 goes for less than that. 

What we learned was this trade was a bust and not good for San Fran. It is a warning to teams it was too much for an unproven rookie. May not happen again...

[OldhamA]

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

The bears would NEVER go from 1 to 9 for that weak of a haul

Sweet, it suits both parties then.

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

Sweet, it suits both parties then.

I agree stay at 9 unless stroud drops to 3

[Byrdman4real]

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I agree stay at 9 unless stroud drops to 3

This

[ncfan]

39 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

From 12 to 3 cost 3 1sts. No way 9 to 1 goes for less than that. 

Why not?

I was told these QBs aren’t good.  So trading up for them shouldn’t be that bad.  And why would there be such a bidding war for these terrible QBs?

[mrcompletely11]

1 minute ago, ncfan said:

Why not?

I was told these QBs aren’t good.  So trading up for them shouldn’t be that bad.  And why would there be such a bidding war for these terrible QBs?

Who told you they weren’t good?

[ncfan]

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Who told you they weren’t good?

I mean that’s a narrative among plenty of people in this fan base (not mine)

 

 

[panfanman]

No thank you.

[Jay Roosevelt]

In a fuging heartbeat.

[onmyown]

anyone who thinks this won’t cost three firsts is delusional

however, throwing burns would cut that down significantly

three firsts and a second or two firsts and three seconds or burns and two firsts are way more realistic scenarios imo

 

[panthers55]

1 hour ago, onmyown said:

anyone who thinks this won’t cost three firsts is delusional

however, throwing burns would cut that down significantly

three firsts and a second or two firsts and three seconds or burns and two firsts are way more realistic scenarios imo

 

When has giving up 3 firsts plus to move up in the draft worked out? Just because someone was stupid enough to do it once doesn't mean that became the norm or will happen again. Lance is the cautionary tale to convince us it wasn't worth it... 

[mrcompletely11]

43 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

When has giving up 3 firsts plus to move up in the draft worked out? Just because someone was stupid enough to do it once doesn't mean that became the norm or will happen again. Lance is the cautionary tale to convince us it wasn't worth it... 

didn’t the eagles do it?