Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Lamar be going to our division rival?


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

You guys are sleeping on Atlanta. 

Them landing Lamar only hurts us in many ways - By them getting a franchise QB to go with their HC who by all accounts seems to be solid, a young offensive core with a stud young TE, and the second most Cap space in the league.

Not to mention this would probably put Baltimore at #8 with draft capital to be able to move up and take any QB they want. 

We'd have to sell the farm to get to #1 that way.

I think best case scenario is we trade to #3 with AZ who are rebuilding and could use a haul of picks and take the last QB remaining between Levis, Young and Stroud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ricky Spanish said:

You guys are sleeping on Atlanta. 

Them landing Lamar only hurts us in many ways - By them getting a franchise QB to go with their HC who by all accounts seems to be solid, a young offensive core with a stud young TE, and the second most Cap space in the league.

Not to mention this would probably put Baltimore at #8 with draft capital to be able to move up and take any QB they want. 

We'd have to sell the farm to get to #1 that way.

I think best case scenario is we trade to #3 with AZ who are rebuilding and could use a haul of picks and take the last QB remaining between Levis, Young and Stroud. 

Every team in front of us has a  reason to draft a QB. Some are more likely than others, some less. The least likely are Chicago, Seattle, Detroit and Arizona. Houston, Indy, Atlanta, and Vegas are more likely, baring FA acquisitions. IF we decide to move to 1, we're selling the farm no matter what. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't surprise me. Wouldn't worry me much. They have no defense. They only have $56mil in cap space so they won't have much money to get help there. The picks they would have to forfeit wouldn't help them upgrade anywhere else either.

They also don't have a very good coaching staff. Slightly better than we were with Rhule.

He's not much as a passer, but he's a lethal runner. It would be like the Mike vick years, except Vick was an anomaly in those days. We weren't used to running QBs. Now we are. 

Ravens couldn't win with Jackson and they have a better D and better coaching. 

I'll put this defensive coaching staff with this D against any offense ATL could come up with Lamar.

Actually, if I had to choose an NFCS team to trade for Jackson, it would be the falcons. He'd be scarier with the saints or the bucs. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BEASTfromdaEAST said:

@JawnyBlazehow is Lamar not difficult to defend? The guy is electric with a cannon for an arm.

Him with Pitts, London and their backfield would be incredibly hard to defend. Our current D with get diced up by that 

What Scot said. Our D is young and fast. We held him in check with a coach and DC that aren’t good at defense.  I’m not too worried about him with a couple good (not great) weapons in London and Pitts. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...