Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carr Watch

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Kentucky Panther Mentor

Kentucky Panther

Posted
Posted

Nobody should be freaking out that we are meeting with Carr. It was always going to happen, whether the Panthers are very serious about it or just wanting to consider every option available. It makes me feel better, actually, that the team is looking into every possible scenario to see which one could put us in the best position to win. Instead of putting everything into one basket. 

  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

That doesn't make sense though. Carr is going to want a lot of money.

 

Why pay a guy a 3 year contract probably worth 100 mil to be a bridge for the next 3 years?

 

Jimmy G would be cheaper and would probably take a 1 year prove it deal because of his injury history. I rather go that route if the plan is to still draft  a QB. Even Brissett/Minshew could be a bridge QB.

 

 

Because I'm not paying Carr $35M per year. If that's his market value I'm not signing him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Daddy_Uncle Grand Master

Daddy_Uncle

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

If we land him, I could see a scenario where we still pick up a QB in April but more like Haener in R3-4.  

 

 

  

Why would we do that when we already have Corrall. If we go all in a FA QB then we needs our picks put towards filling other holes. Not another clip board holder

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, frankw said:

It's not just due dilligence. They know his asking price they aren't meeting with him for shits and giggles. It's not like we're going to walk in and tell him take this low end prove it deal or we're outta here.

We are never gonna have another exciting person at the QB position again are we. It is just gonna continue to be boring retread vet after boring retread vet. I am so tired of it. 
Thanks for nothing Wilks. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Byrdman4real Mentor

Byrdman4real

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

QB is off the board if we sign Carr. You have to put weapons around him. He's not a QB who can carry a weak offense like Rodgers/Lamar.

 

#9 pick has to be a WR

Two 2nd round picks need to be a TE/RB

Or WR, DE, TE 1st and 2nd round 

S, RB, or LB in 3rd round 

Another QB late rounds

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...