Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Price to move into top 3 based on past trades.


panther4life
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Reebis21 said:

Historically if u look back at true bottom 10 teams drafting a Qb between selections 2-10, it doesn’t usually end up working out. 
 

I think Matt Ryan, Rivers and McNabb are the exceptions until recently with Herbert.

Unless u take the Qb at #1 as a bottom 10 team or as a team who trades up into the top 10, it doesn’t really result in success.

Usually I’d be worried about us drafting a Qb being a “bottom 10 team” but given we only lost a game due to DJ’s helmet coming off and then not replacing a complete moron for a coach last offseason, I view this team as one who shouldn’t be bottom 10.

I think if our brass has a clear cut favorite at Qb, gotta risk it for the biscuit and make a move with the Bears.

Most QB selections don't work out.  Even top picks fail more often than not.  Its a crap shoot, but we probably have to take a shot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

Big risk trading all those picks to go to #3 when that is probably for Levis.  Young and CJ are going top 2 folks

Don’t totally agree because the Smoke around Levi’s being seen as a Josh Allen isn’t fake… I can see team based on Levi’s potential being swayed to take him over both… Wilson went before Fields, Lance and Mac based off potential… Trubisky went before Mahomes and Watson based on potential… Potential is a powerful drug in the scouting world..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Don’t totally agree because the Smoke around Levi’s being seen as a Josh Allen isn’t fake… I can see team based on Levi’s potential being swayed to take him over both… Wilson went before Fields, Lance and Mac based off potential… Trubisky went before Mahomes and Watson based on potential… Potential is a powerful drug in the scouting world..

Just saying it’s a risk and wishful thinking our guy is there at 3

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

If you believe in the prospect you are targeting make the move and shoot your shot. We can't keep being scared.

That’s my point now.. They have been preparing to make this move for the last 2 years.. Now just do what you have to to follow thur..

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is what I can’t get past. You trade up for stroud then maybe you draft nothing but O-line and receivers for the next 2-3 years for whatever you have left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

This is what I can’t get past. You trade up for stroud then maybe you draft nothing but O-line and receivers for the next 2-3 years for whatever you have left. 

I posted in jest but I actually think we're in a good spot to make an aggressive move if we think the right guy is available. We have good young talent at most of the premium positions outside of QB. Moore at WR, Moton and Icky at OT, Burns at EDGE rusher, Brown at DT, Horn at CB. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I posted in jest but I actually think we're in a good spot to make an aggressive remove if we think the right guy is available. We have good young talent at most of the premium positions outside of QB. Moore at WR, Moton and Icky at OT, Burns at EDGE rusher, Brown at DT, Horn at CB. 

Ppl also don’t understand that 2024 and 25 are big cap flexibility years for us.. We have a lot of Cap money after 23 and a QB on a rookie deal..

Excited Season 2 GIF by The Office

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...