Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stafford/Carr Comparison

Cdparr7

By Cdparr7,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
27 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Same. I wouldn't scream either way.

Especially since we're not involved early. Would I want to get in a bidding war for Carr with the bidding starting at $35M per year? No. But if we wait a bit and he comes to talk to us and the number comes down to more like $25M per year over day three years? Hmmm... that becomes a very different scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
46 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's lazy in terms of their really being nothing to discuss then. If we're just trusting the staff then what's to discuss?

Oh, there's still plenty to discuss.

That's my honest opinion though.

And frankly,  after fifteen years of Hurney and three years of Rhule, I'm extremely happy to even be able to say that.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wundrbread33 Grand Master

Wundrbread33

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, frankw said:

Hey guy. We're still on the same topic. I provided you information that you refuse to address because you know it destroys your narrative. Multiple things can be true. Carr is a retread. He's an upgrade over Darnold. Even Teddy Bridgewater is an upgrade over that. The issue is where folks like yourself are now chasing after and propping up anyone that fits that criteria. If he took an affordable deal that would be one thing. But 35 million a year? Big no thanks.

BTW cheers to the most triggered Carr superfan on the huddle 😂🍻

Screenshot_20230225_144009_Firefox.thumb.jpg.bc5b3b41af9293c76eea8d459cf678d0.jpg

Lol dude I think you combine people in your head or something. I’m not on Carr’s nuts. 
 

I simply said what I said about the overuse of “retread”, lumping every QB in the same category, you responded, I asked you to clarify your definition of retread, and you didn’t respond to that but argued something I wasn’t taking about. 
 

Stay organized. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carolina Cajun Veteran

Carolina Cajun

Posted
Posted

I've been saying that hes a good player.  Like I said, I've done a little research and the one thing I've noticed where the dividing line between good/manager QB's and franchise is the 2:1 TD to INT line.  The further someone breaks over the 2:1 the closer a QB comes to being a HOF level QB (aside from Eli in modern NFL, its something I generally see).  Carr is not a HOF QB, he IS however a franchise QB.  He's along the lines of Dak Prescott or Kirk Cousins.  These are QBs that YOU CAN win with, and generally speaking will win more than they lose (good ole Raiders managed to fug that up).  Carr is a solid/good direction we could go if we dont like the options or what it would take to get an elite qb in the draft, it would allow for us to potentially win quickly.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

He's played at a high level with 1 playoff appearance in his entire 9 year career.

We all get he's a middle of the pack QB which isn't bad, but we don't need a 32 year old QB with this roster. Carr needs a lot of help around him to make a run. If we sign Carr we are just a playoff team and 1st round exit every year.

If we had the 49ers type of roster I would be all for signing Carr. I know people trying to paint me as a Carr hater that's not true. I said from the start he isn't the QB we need with this current roster. We just don't have enough talent around him to make a run for a SB right now.

A fan of Lamar Jackson probably shouldn't be using the playoffs as a criteria for judging quarterbacks 😆

Also, teams win, teams lose. Acting like QBs can be judged by a win-loss record is a clear sign you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

I've been saying that hes a good player.  Like I said, I've done a little research and the one thing I've noticed where the dividing line between good/manager QB's and franchise is the 2:1 TD to INT line.  The further someone breaks over the 2:1 the closer a QB comes to being a HOF level QB (aside from Eli in modern NFL, its something I generally see).  Carr is not a HOF QB, he IS however a franchise QB.  He's along the lines of Dak Prescott or Kirk Cousins.  These are QBs that YOU CAN win with, and generally speaking will win more than they lose (good ole Raiders managed to fug that up).  Carr is a solid/good direction we could go if we dont like the options or what it would take to get an elite qb in the draft, it would allow for us to potentially win quickly.

We saw what a Kirk Cousins type of QB ultimately amounts to in the playoffs when they lost to the Giants. The man threw a pass behind the line of scrimmage. No way we need to hitch our wagon to a quarterback whose ceiling is that for 100+ million. Draft and develop our own for a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
56 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

That dude is crazy!

 

He literally did the same thing to me. He's pooing everybody who says something negative about Carr lol

To give you an idea of what you are dealing with. He was once the most outspoken Matt Rhule defender here. Crazy is an understatement.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Lowest Yards Per Completion...All Time.

      By CRA · Posted

      When Parcell’s said Bryce better “walk on water”…..the implied concern wasn’t that the tiny QB could survive being hit.  It was acknowledging he would have to be extremely special to overcome the handicaps he would face at this level.  Which he isn’t and can’t.  which isn’t just being hit.  It’s being able to play in an NFL pocket and make NFL throws from it….and that ultimately is Bryce’s problem.  He doesn’t play well from a NFL pocket and can’t make all the throws as needed.  He can’t see as others can.  Which impacts the throws he does and doesn’t take.  It also impacts him bailing and killing plays and turning them into scrambles/dead plays 
    • aloysius snuffleupagus
      Saturday roll call

      By aloysius snuffleupagus · Posted

      9:30 kick off here in Scotland, which is better than the 01:20 early hours of Monday that I feared. Will definitely be watching, but probably wouldn't if it had been 0120 as I need to be up for work at 05:45. Falcons Saints is 6pm on the Sunday so will watch that too if it becomes relevant
    • MechaZain
      Lowest Yards Per Completion...All Time.

      By MechaZain · Posted

      So much revisionist history around the pre-draft Bryce hype. The media was practically united in saying that if he were a couple inches taller he'd be the perfect prospect and it was just a question of whether he'd hold up in the NFL being that small. The Panthers did not create the mythos around him they were just the team that bought in. The team was largely praised for the move after and for surrounding him with what was considered an all-star coaching staff at the time.  Yeah part of the fanbase wanted Stroud but let's be real, we're coming from an oversized franchise QB who injured himself out the league. There was some analysis here on the limitations of Bryce's game but people were mostly just concerned he was going to turn into dust when he got sacked in the NFL.
×
×
  • Create New...