Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Gantt indicates the Panthers should bring in Carr


TheMaulClaw
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It would be a neat trick to watch fitt try and get under the cap to accommodate his 60 million salary and resigning burns

I'm hoping some adults in the room will point out the obvious that most teams are competing with younger QB's on rookie contracts instead of veterans on bloated 150+ million dollar contracts. Scott has to know if he throws the whole franchise at Carr he's outta here if we aren't making a deep playoff run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

I'm hoping some adults in the room will point out the obvious that most teams are competing with younger QB's on rookie contracts instead of veterans on bloated 150+ million dollar contracts. Scott has to know if he throws the whole franchise at Carr he's outta here if we aren't making a deep playoff run.

The "but but but the nfc south sucks and we can win it with carr" rationale from posters is pretty fuging stupid as well.  Lets build a team that is upper tier in the nfl and simply built to win the shitty south

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Aaron Rodgers doesn't have a no-trade clause, but he has to approve of any deal because if he doesn't like where he's traded, he can just say we will retire, and any team trading for him will want to know that detail before any actual trade is approved. So, it's an effective no-trade clause, even if it's not an official one.

As for them not trading him if he wants to be traded, sure they can hold him hostage, but that would be dumb on their part because they won't get any compensation for him, and they'll likely end up paying him 60 mil to do nothing. 

Yeah, Rodgers doesn't have the kind of leverage you think.

Rodgers can't force the Packers to do something against their own best interests. Neither does he have the kind of goodwill with his team that Matt Stafford had.

The fact that he's made a very public ass of himself over the last few years doesn't exactly help in the PR department either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, Rodgers doesn't have the kind of leverage you think.

Rodgers can't force the Packers to do something against their own best interests. Neither does he have the kind of goodwill with his team that Matt Stafford had.

The fact that he's made a very public ass of himself over the last few years doesn't exactly help in the PR department either.

He has plenty of leverage due to his contract.  He can be a jackass and not redo his deal severely limiting the teams that can trade for him or he can choose the team and say he can rework his deal to make it fit under the cap.  Not the same as a no trade clause but plenty enough power if he wants to be a poo head

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, Rodgers doesn't have the kind of leverage you think.

Rodgers can't force the Packers to do something against their own best interests. Neither does he have the kind of goodwill with his team that Matt Stafford had.

The fact that he's made a very public ass of himself over the last few years doesn't exactly help in the PR department either.

The threat of retirement is as real as leverage gets. I don't think the Packers will do anything against their best interests, and that's why they'll trade him if he decides to part ways or they decide to move on and see what Love has during this last year of his rookie contract. Moreover, for all the complaints about Rodgers being a headache, he won't lack for suitors, and it's been reported lately that he's going to be right there in Green Bay, so him being an A-hole doesn't seem to be affecting his market one bit. Even if he can't come to the NFCS, those markets weren't really the best for his situation anyway. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ornias said:

Would Brissett be an option? 2 year bridge contract for like 10-15m a year. 

Younger than Carr 61.1% career passer (64% most recent season with Cleveland).  I think he might be a good addition...and cheaper than Carr.

Of course, we still go after a QB, but this would open the door for projects like Levis, Richardson, or Herndon. 

I would not hate it.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ncstatekwi said:

It will be interesting to see if something even happens before the draft....if it does then it tips our hand......

Only tipping of the hand is if we go all-in on a bona fide QB1.  Signing anything less than Rogers, Jimmy G., Jones, Jackson or Carr does not preclude us drafting a QB.  Yes, I totally expect us to sign a FA QB.  We'd be stupid not to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

We need to be heavily into the Carr interest, especially early on, if for nothing else to drive up the price.

He's a good guy and a good QB, and if we could have him for the right price, he'd be great here. We won't be able to get him for the right price, though, so we should do our best to make sure whichever one of the NFCSouth teams snags him, that there's a nice, hefty contract that will richly reward him and hamstring them for the next four to five years.

I don't see too many post on this forum that I consider  to be twisted and diabolical , yet clever and somewhat brillliant at the same time. 😂

Edited by SCO96
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

The threat of retirement is as real as leverage gets. I don't think the Packers will do anything against their best interests, and that's why they'll trade him if he decides to part ways or they decide to move on and see what Love has during this last year of his rookie contract. Moreover, for all the complaints about Rodgers being a headache, he won't lack for suitors, and it's been reported lately that he's going to be right there in Green Bay, so him being an A-hole doesn't seem to be affecting his market one bit. Even if he can't come to the NFCS, those markets weren't really the best for his situation anyway. 

Not when the team is reportedly "done with you", it isn't.

All indications are at this point they're ready to call pretty much any bluff he plays.

Throw in that his likely most amorous suitor is a team that's in the AFC and employs a coach he likes very much.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Younger than Carr 61.1% career passer (64% most recent season with Cleveland).  I think he might be a good addition...and cheaper than Carr.

Of course, we still go after a QB, but this would open the door for projects like Levis, Richardson, or Herndon. 

I would not hate it.

He should be cheaper than Carr, he's thrown for 169 less TDs and 24,872 less yards than Derek. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

I'm hoping some adults in the room will point out the obvious that most teams are competing with younger QB's on rookie contracts instead of veterans on bloated 150+ million dollar contracts. Scott has to know if he throws the whole franchise at Carr he's outta here if we aren't making a deep playoff run.

That's already his preference (stated numerous times).

But is it Frank Reich's preference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exhibit A of why Woods was cut....   Trying to shoulder knockdown the best WR in the NFL ends up with air   Also not sure what the h*ll coverage Horn was playing but covering nothibg after a poo jam 
    • I'm just telling you what the team is currently looking at. Aho, Jarvis, Staal, KK as the four centers in that order as of right now.  Obviously id prefer them to go get McTavish but the asking price is pretty damn high. 
    • Summary Austin Corbett being named a starter already might be strategic because it allows the team to have Cade Mays compete to play LG if Damien Lewis continues to have shoulder issues going into the season. Brady Christensen is most valuable to the team as the sixth-man/swing tackle for the OL and having him start a game at guard only to have to kick out to tackle (should there be an injury) is less than ideal. Was the weakest link on the OL when he was the starting LG and though he has short arms he is too athletic and so good in space that playing him at tackle is better. RT makes more sense as it's brawn-on-brawn more than it is on the weakside where somebody like Princely Umanmielen can out-athletic him. Cade Mays provides similar versatility that Christensen does, but can stick to the interior while Brady stays on the outside (unless, Lord forbid, there's multiple injuries that requires Mays + Christensen on the interior and Nijman to takeover at OT). Kaye thinks that the only keep two QBs on the roster and while he's seen some of the angst that Andy Dalton caused from the preseason opener but through the first two weeks of training camp he looked like he could be in the conversation if there was a competition for QB1. Not because of any lacking one Bryce's behalf, but just based on the great looks he's given the second-team defense. He's lofted balls into the endzone including a big TD to Coker. Also threw about 45yds through the air to TJ Luther for a TD. Zietlow empathizes with the fans because they can't see anything from training camp. Mike has the team keeping three RBs with Raheem Blackshear as the odd-man out with Etienne set to take over as one of the two returners. Former Ragin' Cajun and Horned Frog Emani Bailey has looked good running the ball in the last couple of practices as well as during the preseason opener. Likely priority practice squad candidate. Thinks that the team should only keep six WRs in order to take an extra OL or DL into the season, but summoning his inner Eric Eager Kaye doesn't see how they justify not keeping seven WRs without a trade. Doesn't think if it's a failure if a trade can't come to fruition to move that seventh WR if they do that. Loves what he's seeing out of McMillan, Coker, and Legette. TMac is starting to surge and Jimmy Horn Jr might be the lead punt returner. With the team being so light on quality special teams players, David Moore might be somebody that they can cut and bring back. All of the WRs further down the roster are also making plays (lists Tremayne, Luther, and George). Alex likes their initial numbers: two QBs, three RBs, and seven WRs. Mike points out that with seven WRs there's no way the team takes four TEs. Will Tremble be healthy and if not who makes the roster while he recovers? James Mitchell has looked good and like it might be him if that's the route. Poses the question of do they take 10 OL? Probably going to have eight active on game day but with DLew's injury, TMo's history, Hunt getting dinged up recently in practice, Corbett's back-to-back season ending injuries creates a legitimate conversation about whether or not they go into the season with ten OL and then try to stash one on the practice squad afterwards. Couple of minutes of debate over the classification of the word hero... Don't have LaBryan Ray, Shy Tuttle, nor Akayleb Evans on their final 53. Quick intermission as they bring on The Houston Chronicle's Jonathan Alexander (formerly of The Charlotte Observer where he was once the Panthers' beat reporter). JA thinks that some of the critique of CJ's game last season was overblown but also understands that folks want to see growth from year one to year two rather than regression but he still had some good moments. Still had a decent TD:INT ratio (20:12) and was listed at #39 in the recent NFL Top 100. Texans were dealing with a lot of injuries early in the summer: Joe Mixon has a foot issue from an off-field injury, Nick Chubb is returning from a season ending injury and recently came back from a concussion as well, Dameon Pierce who is coming back from a quad injury and just recently practiced in full for the first time, Dare Ogunbowale is their do-it-all guy (including emergency kicker), and they drafted Woody Marks out of USC in the 4th round of the 2025 draft. The team might even try to sneak five RBs on to the roster. Chubb isn't a guarantee to make the roster with how much they like Pierce, Dare, and recently invested a 4th in Marks. Talked issues in the secondary after CJGJ's injury and Jimmie Ward's felony assault charge. CJGJ injury was really tough even though he'll come back at some point during the season. Stingley and Lassiter provides them with two lockdown outside CBs. Kaylin Bulock is a ball hawk that struggles in the run game but Jaylen Petri is one of the best hitters/blitzers at the nickel position in the league (though he gives up some in the pass game). They're still going to be strong in the secondary even without CJGJ. DL is one of the best in the league. Will Anderson Jr and Danielle Hunter on the outside with a deeper DT room. DL + secondary are the strongest areas of the defense. Houston WR room has a lot of names that even casual football fans know of (Nico Collins, Christian Kirk, Tank Dell, John Metchie III, Braxton Berrios, both of the Iowa State WRs, etc). Main four are Collins, Kirk, Higgins (Iowa St), and Noel (Iowa St). Open competition for the remaining two to three spots depending on what Berrios has done since coming back from injury. If Berrios is good to go, they could keep seven. John Metchie III, Xavier Hutchinson (a former Iowa St WR himself), and Justin Watson (former Chief) are all competing for those remaining spots with Berrios. Rookie contract guarantees have been getting deeper and deeper every year, so when Higgins was drafted the Texans didn't want to deal with the back-and-forth so they just guaranteed the full deal. Asked about what the external view of Bryce Young is outside of the Carolinas. Jonathan says that the league respects Bryce and the Texans do especially. CJ and him are close, Will Anderson is close with Bryce, Henry Too'too is close with Bryce, Metchie is close with Bryce. Whenever they're asked about him they show nothing but love, including saying that he was going to turn things around in Carolina. Folks around the organization and others outside of Carolina around the league feel like the Panthers didn't put the necessary tools around Bryce in his rookie season. They gave him the tools in his second season, but it was all about his confidence then. They think he's going to be one of the better QBs in the league for a long time. End of Jonathan's segment. Back to just Mike and Alex. Roster bets! Can't be guys that you know are going to be on the roster or win jobs. Outside of the kicker competition there isn't too many positions up in the air. Of the guys in the 45 - 55 range, stake their claim on who they think will make the roster. MK starts with Jaden Crumedy, last year's sixth-round pick. Likes what he's been doing in the run game, feels like he complements DB well. A'Shawn Robinson is complemented by Turk Wharton and Bobby Brown III is complemented by Cam Jackson. AZ points out how Crumedy played in five different defensive schemes in college. AZ goes with Ja'Tyre Carter. He had a solid rest of the game after giving up his initial sack which wasn't exactly egregious. This training camp has shown how important OL depth is and with how much has been invested they're going to want to make sure to keep the strength a strength (especially with three of the five starters already dinged up). Could make the roster as OL10. He's serviceable and part of a group that needs as much depth as possible, so sees the logic in keeping him. MK's next pick... Thomas Incoom. He's been terrific at practice on defense and was solid against the Browns on special teams. Doesn't see why DJ Johnson would be kept over Incoom as the latter is a better pass rusher and a much, much better ST contributor (doesn't hurt that he's outperformed DJ Johnson in every which way). Pointed out a play where DJ Johnson froze up on a reverse when he's supposed to be a good run defender. They've put a lot in and while Evero was pro-DJ Johnson, he was ultimately a selection of the previous regime. Pointed out Brandt Tillis' comments about not cutting Turk Wharton because it would lose the team trying to stash him rather than fielding the best 53 players. Morgan + Tillis don't benefit from storing a player that they didn't draft, and Incoom brings so much on special teams while also providing a pass rush despite needing to improve against the run. AZ's pick... Nick Scott. Both agree that he's a special teamer and a back-up, but Scott also brings a legitimate leadership quality to the team that's well-liked by everybody. Both agree that Ransom and Richardson deserve reps over Nick Scott, but he provides a great locker room presence that benefits the team. If he can be the defense's version of David Moore then he provides even more value than he does as a starter. Ransom has been one of the best defensive players in camp and Richardson showed that he is a very capable defensive player at safety. End.
×
×
  • Create New...