Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In-Depth Film Evaluation on QB Anthony Richardson


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I thought the scouts were like his mechanics and release?  He is a tough one to grade because he was constantly running for his life at Stanford.... 

Just check out his vids.  Really sloppy and he has a baseball throwing sideball.  Even more accentuated than Rivers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

I do not "follow" anyone. I will let you decide for yourself who to believe.  Don't take my word for it.

Apologies, I thought you were saying you follow the pro scouts and they don’t rate him in the top 5 at the position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

What am I missing on Clayton Tune?  He seems to be getting overlooked while lighting it up a Houston.  He looks to have decent size as well as a ton of experience....

There's an amazing amount of silence on every qb except the 4 everyone is blabbing about.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

McKee's throwing motion and footwork are wonky.  For being so prototypical size wise, he doesn't really have the feel IMO.  

I have not watched any of his games. Was just curious why I've seen him ranked above AR several times.  It's got me really curious to see how the staff rank them. 

This class is getting more hype than it deserves from the media. I think a most of it is driven by the amount of team that need a franchise qb. But I digress.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I have not watched any of his games. Was just curious why I've seen him ranked above AR several times.  It's got me really curious to see how the staff rank them. 

This class is getting more hype than it deserves from the media. I think a most of it is driven by the amount of team that need a franchise qb. But I digress.  

I don't really sense a real huge amount of hype.  The concerns on Bryce's size are well advertised, Stroud's pressure moments early season, Levis' decision making, how raw Richardson is, & Hooker's age are pretty loudly discussed.  Their faults have been as widely discussed as their strengths.   

The rest of the class just isn't that quality.  The inexperienced developmental guys that would've been fun to see rise/fall like Ward, Penix, etc. all stayed in school.  

 

Edited by Bear Hands
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Varking said:

I love friendly bets!

You got anything in mind thus far?? Still got a few weeks and I normal come up with the bets. Doesnt matter to me, I read your posts and dont think we are in much difference thoughts. 

Plus LOL at you still rockin the avatar! 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...