Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DARNOLD


CPcavedweller
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Inyo said:

prior to that Saints game, though, Sam had engineered the NFL's most efficient passing offense. As not a few remarked at time: Bet you didn't have that on your bingo card.

But remember: It was a win, nevertheless, thanks to some tremendous defense and an effective rushing game. Sam came alive when needed, hitting that decisive 20 yard pass to set up the game winning field goal. Great road victory for the Panthers against a determined opponent.

The man was outplayed by an aging Andy Dalton lol. Some people really live for trying to polish not just mediocrity but horrific QB play. Man this team needs a real franchise quarterback and someone who will shake things up and drive out this pitiful culture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I cannot decide what would shock the most, them bring him back or not bringing him back.  The reactions here will be priceless if they do. 

Ive changed some after the geno, jones, and carr deals...... now its not so bad for a lower 5-10(ugh) type of deal.....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Im expecting Jimmy G because that is the Tepper thing to do.

 

Also expect a non QB at #9 because we aren't trading up.

 

We will try this again next year. It's the Panthers way...

JimmyG is heavy rumored to be in either the texans or raiders plans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Inyo said:

Just wondering. Is the poster equating QBR with passer rating, or total QBR (invented by ESPN, unveiled in 2011)? They're different statistical measurements, of course.

In the "modern passing era" (AKA, post 1990), Rex Grossman of the Bears has the lowest NFL passer rating in a win (1.3 versus the Vikings in 2006). Sam is in second place on that list--second lowest passer rating in a winning game at 2.8. Before 1990, though, there are actually eight quarterbacks who achieved victories with--wait for it--a passer rating of of zero.

Note that this is based on passer rating--not total QBR.  Darnold's total QBR in that Saints game was 11.1. Somebody with access to ESPN's total QBR library could determine if that's the lowest winning total QBR in NFL history (based on the last 12 years, only).

So, here's the thing. A philosophical query: Would the  poster rather have a Panthers quarterback achieve the 2nd highest passer rating in league history in a loss, or the second lowest passer rating in NFL history in a victory?

Of course, fantasy football aficionados would likely prefer the former scenario, one must allow. And if you're looking merely to save face as a fan of a franchise, you probably don't want your quarterback looking so incompetent, even in a win; prior to that Saints game, though, Sam had engineered the NFL's most efficient passing offense. As not a few remarked at time: Bet you didn't have that on your bingo card.

But remember: It was a win, nevertheless, thanks to some tremendous defense and an effective rushing game. Sam came alive when needed, hitting that decisive 20 yard pass to set up the game winning field goal. Great road victory for the Panthers against a determined opponent.

That is a lot from very little and a passing gag. Yikes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/8/2023 at 7:42 AM, frankw said:

So does Jameis. Doesn't mean we need to sign either. And Darnold has already told you guys the deal you don't listen. QB is just a job to him. He is not concerned about going to the hall of fame or being a Super Bowl winning quarterback. You can hype his physical tools all you want. Doesn't mean anything if he doesn’t want to be great.

Why did you make this up? You were asked for a source, and your response wasn’t a source, but your interpretation of his practice routines. 
 

There’s plenty of evidence he isn’t a good QB without having to create another narrative out of thin air (unless you have an actual source).

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Why did you make this up? You were asked for a source, and your response wasn’t a source, but your interpretation of his practice routines. 
 

There’s plenty of evidence he isn’t a good QB without having to create another narrative out of thin air (unless you have an actual source).

He's the same flawed quarterback he was five years ago with the Jets. He has not developed. You guys want to blame Adam Gase Matt Rhule and whatever other boogeyman you can find when it's ultimately up to Sam to change his habits. Look no further than his last start. Worse than any we've seen with even Jimmy Clausen. You're telling me that guy has been giving it his all to improve and wants to be a hall of famer and win Super Bowls? He had 19 million reasons and many more to get out there and put Baker Mayfield in the rear view in camp and by his own words he could not be bothered. Keep playing the blame game like you owe him something though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, frankw said:

He's the same flawed quarterback he was five years ago with the Jets. He has not developed. You guys want to blame Adam Gase Matt Rhule and whatever other boogeyman you can find when it's ultimately up to Sam to change his habits. Look no further than his last start. Worse than any we've seen with even Jimmy Clausen. You're telling me that guy has been giving it his all to improve and wants to be a hall of famer and win Super Bowls? He had 19 million reasons and many more to get out there and put Baker Mayfield in the rear view in camp and by his own words he could not be bothered. Keep playing the blame game like you owe him something though.

So, no source?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he is BPA, then yes. I am a believer in Dan at this point and hope that he doubles on his strat from last draft.  T-Mac wasnt the biggest need, but at a first round position, over-drafting for need is bad.  We had XL coming back (we didnt know he'd catch rabid Racoon Disease in the offseason and forget how to be even an acceptable WR), Thielen coming back (yes...old AF thielen was a 1k reciever) and Coker coming off a surprising season...if you asked RIGHT AT THIS SAME POINT LAST OFFSEASON if we should draft Defense or T-Mac where we were last year, I guarantee 70-80% would have said "WHY THE fug ARE WE TAKING A RECIEVER!?!?!".  We're getting close, but you build a winning roster by Drafting studs in the first round and depth after, and Studs dont come from "Well we needed a Long Snapper", they come from "I dont care if we don't need a Receiver, That dude is THE DUDE"
    • I honestly don't care about NBA talent. Our last championship team was light on it. The team that went to the title game was light on it. I wanna win college games. I haven't watched a full NBA game in probably 15 years. I barely remember one and doners, whether their ours or elsewhere. It's one of the reasons why my hatred of duke has cooled. Their players don't hang around long enough for me to even know their names.
    • Should hopefully pick up a half-game on the Sixers and Heat tonight. Also possibly the Hawks and Magic. 🐝🐝🐝
×
×
  • Create New...