Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breaking: Lamar Jackson is available as Raven's have placed the non-exclusive franchise tag on him.


thunderraiden
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We'd be crazy not to at least talk about it. Do I think we'll actually do it? No.

I would imagine the conversation going like this.

Fitterer; Anyone in favor of giving Lamar a fully guaranteed contract?

Everyone in the room; silence 

Fitterer; OK then, let's move on to the draft class. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

The topic is also on this board my man.

 

Why is it such a big topic if that isn't the case?

 

We all trying to figure out why nobody is interested in a franchise QB in his prime. Nobody is offering a contract...

It has been explained to you multiple times but you ignore it. He will cost 2 first round picks, he wants a huge guaranteed contract, he has been injury prone the last two years, he has his mommy trying to negotiate on his behalf, it really isn't that hard to see why teams would not make a move for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

No team is even offering him a contract as of yet.

Somebody said he can't even talk to teams until a week from now.

A lot of conflicting reports so far.

I ask you this how is a QB with a MVP on his resume and a QB who wins 75% of his games not even get a team to offer him a contract?

Deshaun Watson had the entire league after him with his off field issues.

If you think those situations have nothing to do with each other so be it.

Im like the players on this one "how is this guy not even getting a offer".

We've had this discussion.

It's not as simple as saying "He's really good, let's go get him." There are a hundred other real world details that you have to factor into the discussion.

This isn't Madden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Save yourself Scot. He doesn't get it and will never get it. 

 

2 hours ago, Panthera onca said:

Being deliberately obtuse seems to be the shtick he is going with these days.

Probably, but I'll give him credit that at least sometimes he's now asking questions rather than just dogmatically voicing his own opinion.

Not in this thread, though.

2 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

How old do we think CamWhoaaCam is?

 

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm going with less than 20.

I'd call that a safe bet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rams since you beat them already and they are 0-2 on the road against NFC South teams.
    • Let's say we take care of business against the Bucs and/or the Falcons take care of the Saints and we lock that 4th seed for the playoffs. Who do we root for this Sunday in the NFC West matchup with Seahawks at San Francisco winner takes the NFC West division. A Seahawks win would mean we face the Rams at home or with a 49ers win we host the Seahawks again.  Which opponent would most prefer? In the earlier Rams game we won primary due to turnovers specifically Mike Jackson pick-6 in combination with a good running game with Chuba and Rico whereas we kept the Rams offense off the field and Bryce was able to connect on two big 4th down throws for touchdowns. However when the Rams offense was on the field they pretty much got whatever they wanted, Williams and Corum gashed us in the run game, and we had no answer for Devonte Adams. Granted whe were missing some pieces on defense with Horn and Moehrig. Against Seattle our defense held it's own for the most part, it was our offense and turnovers which aided in the Panthers loss.  Seattle was the most stingy, best tackling defense the Panthers have played all season, and when we turned Darnold over we didn't do much with it.  The offense had no answers for what the defense was throwing at them and apparently were caught off guard by the amount of man coverage the Seahawks played.  With all that who do you think would be the better matchup the 2nd time around? I trust Stafford far more than I do Darnold, both running games are on par with each other, of the defenses Seattle has the dominant unit.  I personally prefer Seattle again, that would mark their 3rd consecutive road game, we've just played them, so we know exactly what to expect, and I feel Caneles should be able to come up with a better scheme to counteract what the Seahawks defense was doing, and we may be able to trip Darnold up, I don't want to try and win another shootout against the Rams.               
    • I remember watching him at bama and thinking he throws a lot of wobbly non spiral balls that have very little velocity. Knew it would be a real problem in the NFL and it is. 
×
×
  • Create New...