Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

JOE PERSON: Panthers will not pursue Lamar Jackson


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

If we miss out on the top four...trade back, get extra picks, and fill out with offensive weapons, 3-4 defensive players, and Hendon Hooker....We have the staff to coach up anyone. Age doesn't scare me too much, given non-running QB lifespans in the league.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I think there is a valid real plan with hooker included. 

I maybe the only one that doesnt want to ultra force getting some "savior" QB. 

You're not the only one...

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers... "

Edited by bythenbrs
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, KBRed said:

If we miss out on the top four...trade back, get extra picks, and fill out with offensive weapons, 3-4 defensive players, and Hendon Hooker....We have the staff to coach up anyone. Age doesn't scare me too much, given non-running QB lifespans in the league.

Draft him at the very tail end of R1 and we get five years on that first contract.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Welp looks like the owners have come together. Nobody is even going to offer him a contract.lol Browns are stuck with that Watson contract. The rest of the owners aren't having it.

 

 

yessir lol, this is blatant as hell.

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bythenbrs said:

Collusion?  How about each owner independently looked at the Watson contract and projectile vomited?

It's now what, six teams to make a statement that they don't want Jackson? That's really odd. This is smokescreen season and throwing off other teams as to what you plan to do during the off-season is half the game. It's in teams' interest to obscure what they're doing, often leaking false information, to put pressure on other franchises. However, it seems that teams are definitely making statements one by one of their intent.

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...