Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Kunkel says we're only "seriously interested" in three


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

This. We're going to hear every rumor under the sun and be expected to draft every draft eligible QB between now and then. Buckle up and don't get too excited or disappointed along the way.

Now where's the fun in that? It's entertaining to watch the meltdowns over rumors. I cannot wait until draft night when bubbles are burst and the ranting goes into overdrive. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why anyone gives Will Kunkel any level of credence. Let the rumors fly. Regardless it's much better knowing for sure one way or the other we are going to make some kind of big move. I'll hope for the best whichever QB we end up drafting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Now where's the fun in that? It's entertaining to watch the meltdowns over rumors. I cannot wait until draft night when bubbles are burst and the ranting goes into overdrive. 

Doesn't matter what we do, there will be a sizeable faction of the Huddle who thinks we've paved the way to a dynasty and a roughly equally sizeable faction who thinks we've doomed ourselves to a decade of bottom feeding. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I hope he's right. I hope there are three QBs we'd love to have. That means we can go to #3 instead of #1. It still won't be cheap but hopefully considerably cheaper than #1.

If they want someone that can start day 1, that only leaves 1, maybe 2 QBs(Young and maybe Stroud). Levis is not ready to start.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Now where's the fun in that? It's entertaining to watch the meltdowns over rumors. I cannot wait until draft night when bubbles are burst and the ranting goes into overdrive. 

So true.

Honestly, I don't know who they should draft, but I know they had better be right, especially if they move up. And I'm not even necessarily saying they have to get the best guy, but the pick had better be able to lead a football team...on the field.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

So true.

Honestly, I don't know who they should draft, but I know they had better be right, especially if they move up. And I'm not even necessarily saying they have to get the best guy, but the pick had better be able to lead a football team...on the field.

This the best you can hope for. If he turns out to be better than that then let's win this thing. If he's turns out to be worse then back to the draft we go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Honestly, I hope he's right. I hope there are three QBs we'd love to have. That means we can go to #3 instead of #1. It still won't be cheap but hopefully considerably cheaper than #1.

He's not the only one saying that.

It pretty closely matches what Joe Person has said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
    • He had the award until like the last 8 games. He sucked ass and flagg had 3 40 point games
×
×
  • Create New...