Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Free Agent Updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

Anyone else upset we haven't locked down Chark? Not saying he is great but it gives us a number 1 that has to be accounted for which puts every other receiver exactly where they should be, meaning Theilan 2 , CMJ 3. N Shi 4. Am I crazy

No. He's not worth getting upset over. He's ok would be a nice piece but nothing to get excited over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Kunkel strikes again!

 

 

All of these people use likely well intending people making educated guesses. , "per sources" probably means all the anchors and writers, and twitter analysts reference each other for content

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe these FA signings have showed us that Carolina has bought 2 years to find the future at TE and WR. Hurst and Thielen are on the wrong side of 30 and are a temporary fix....though will be productive here for the next couple of seasons.

We've got the next two offseasons to figure out our WR1 and TE1 of the future. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Soul Rebel said:

I believe these FA signings have showed us that Carolina has bought 2 years to find the future at TE and WR. Hurst and Thielen are on the wrong side of 30 and are a temporary fix....though will be productive here for the next couple of seasons.

We've got the next two offseasons to figure out our WR1 and TE1 of the future. 

Thielen I agree with, Hurst only has 5 years worth of wear.  Can def see using him to set the foundation for passing TEs in the offense and bringing along more guys with his skillset by the sunset of his contract.  Get guys in to surpass him on a rookie deal or make a splash in FA in a few years. I could see him here for up to 5 years health and production dependent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Steelo Senpai said:

Chark deal shows we either gonna see if he's healthy enough for an extension after the season or we'll def be in the market for a WR in the draft.  The 1 year deal doesn't resolve the need in my eyes.

No, but it does give us more time to draft one and let him learn behind these vet guys for a whole year. Everything time wise is being set up perfectly.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Castavar said:

No, but it does give us more time to draft one and let him learn behind these vet guys for a whole year. Everything time wise is being set up perfectly.

Exactly, I still think we target one. Yet it gives us the ability NOT too if there's a better defensive prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...