Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rodgers Watch


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 3/14/2023 at 6:00 PM, MHS831 said:

He might have the biggest ego I have ever experienced since my own blasted out of control after winning the Capt. D's hushpuppy eating contest when I was in high school.  I was intolerable for about a month.

Probably had a bad case of the heartburn to go with it. LOL 🙂

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

He literally just said since last Friday he's told the team he's gonna play for the Jets because he doesnt want to retire yet and the Packers want to move on with Love. 

He's not holding anybody hostage. The report from today that the Packers want a Stafford like package of two firsts despite having zero leverage look like they're the ones holding everyone hostage. 

The Packers have lost their mind if they think a team would be stupid enough to give them two first rd draft choices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Would I want a QB who, just about a month ago, claimed he was 90% retired and crawled into a hippy cave of blackness for several days to contemplate how he is the greatest Green Bay Packer ever?

Hard pass.

I see you're stuck in the last century.
He did a retreat which is considered would wide as a mechanism of self realization and healing. It has cultural significance centuries older than this country and certainly, older that this nation's hypocritical viewpoints on what constitutes as derogatory drug use. 
You speaking ill on the use of DMT by respective shamans is only a statement to your insecurity in your own self and beliefs. I'm sorry you have been lied to and I'm even more sorry you bought into those narratives.
Speaking of drug use, have you had your booster lately? 

Edited by Cam's New Arm
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cam's New Arm said:

I see you're stuck in the last century.
He did a retreat which is considered would wide as a mechanism of self realization and healing. It has cultural significance centuries older than this country and certainly, older that this nation's hypocritical viewpoints on what constitutes as derogatory drug use. 
You speaking ill on the use of DMT by respective shamans is only a statement to your insecurity in your own self and beliefs. I'm sorry you have been lied to and I'm even more sorry you bought into those narratives.
Speaking of drug use, have you had your booster lately? 

*world wide

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Cam's New Arm said:

I see you're stuck in the last century.
He did a retreat which is considered would wide as a mechanism of self realization and healing. It has cultural significance centuries older than this country and certainly, older that this nation's hypocritical viewpoints on what constitutes as derogatory drug use. 
You speaking ill on the use of DMT by respective shamans is only a statement to your insecurity in your own self and beliefs. I'm sorry you have been lied to and I'm even more sorry you bought into those narratives.
Speaking of drug use, have you had your booster lately? 

 What the hell do you know about it?  You accuse me of being stuck in the last century when you start babbling about stuff "centuries older than this country" and then you mention "hypocritical viewpoints?"  Then you feel qualified to evaluate me as if you are some therapist or something?  So you attack opinions (personally) that do not agree with your own (as misguided and juvenile as they are) and you pretend to perch alongside the high road of reason and morality?

Please do not talk to others about hypocrisy while being a hypocrite.  Informed readers see that it makes a statement about you more than anyone else. 

And about the booster comment and "drug use."  I was not speaking of 'drug use."

Let me tell you about opinions, you sage of ancient forms of spiritual meditation, mine is base on fact--yours is based on some google search that landed on some crackhead's blog.   He did say he was 90% leaning toward retirement.  Now my opinion is that I am not giving that guy $60m per year to QB my team and I do not think 4 days without a nightlight changes that.  This just in:  I do not care what you think about it.  You are a common troll who professes to have life figured out by analyzing people using fake names on a football discussion board.  How petty and insecure must you be?

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

 What the hell do you know about it?  You accuse me of being stuck in the last century when you start babbling about stuff "centuries older than this country" and then you mention "hypocritical viewpoints?"  Then you feel qualified to evaluate me as if you are some therapist or something?  So you attack opinions (personally) that do not agree with your own (as misguided and juvenile as they are) and you pretend to perch alongside the high road of reason and morality?

Please do not talk to others about hypocrisy while being a hypocrite.  Informed readers see that it makes a statement about you more than anyone else. 

And about the booster comment and "drug use."  I was not speaking of 'drug use."

Let me tell you about opinions, you sage of ancient forms of spiritual meditation, mine is base on fact--yours is based on some google search that landed on some crackhead's blog.   He did say he was 90% leaning toward retirement.  Now my opinion is that I am not giving that guy $60m per year to QB my team and I do not think 4 days without a nightlight changes that.  This just in:  I do not care what you think about it.  You are a common troll who professes to have life figured out by analyzing people using fake names on a football discussion board.  How petty and insecure must you be?

Just future advice, but if you're going to report a post for "personal attack"  don't go on a ranting significantly worse personal attack yourself at the same time.

Y'all knock it off. Take this to the TB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just future advice, but if you're going to report a post for "personal attack"  don't go on a ranting significantly worse personal attack yourself at the same time.

Y'all knock it off. Take this to the TB.

If you need to make a personal statement to me, would you send me a PM?  Thanks

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • we got spoiled having superman and even then...he wasn't enough. superman was a fluke. there are incredibly unrealistic expectations for a first round QB, especially a first overall pick. people look at the short term, first year, rather than what you might get the next 10 and they also think that what you see the first year or two is what you get the rest of the time.  it just doesn't work like that. these guys are all young and a work in progress. you draft on potential. what it takes to reach that potential is different for everyone and it all depends on the situation they fall into, the player pieces around them, the scheme they either put him in or develop around him (the latter is better), and the coaching they give him. then there's also the work the player has to put into it. the work they put into is is the only thing they can control. the rest is just luck. 
    • I actually agree with everything you've said here. My comment was directed to the posters who feel the need to derail threads with the same Bryce talking points over and over again. It's just tiresome, even if what they're saying has some truth to it.
    • That's not totally the case. It is hard to discuss future without a crystal ball, you look at the past the to assess and project, and there is a lot of on field negative from year one. Some people say throw it out. You can’t dismiss things that were on him and not the OL or Reich or Chark or Mingo etc., if you want the real story.  That footwork is not just people picking on him, it is probably a huge barrier to his potential success. All the passing comes from a base and if it is off the throws are hard to trust.  OTA optimism is fools gold tbh. It buys nothing. We have seen the skins and shirts all stars enough times to know what that is. We will need real football at real football game speed which we won’t get even in preseason.  That said I expect him to somehow make his way to somewhere in QB tiers or rankings to maybe low 20s. Gotta win 6 at least for that.  My opinion is if they can make a playoff run with a 4th tier QB then fine but I’d just as soon go over to the side of those who for years held out for a QB capable of taking the team to and winning a SB. I am not thinking he is that guy so far but taking this year to find out is necessary. 
×
×
  • Create New...