Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Former Panthers QB: “No doubt in my mind” they pick Bryce Young


Cary Kollins
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, RumHam said:

name one good ohio state quarterback. i'll wait.

I don’t understand this argument. I’ve seen it a lot and I don’t understand how a college QB history as any meaningful effect on how good a guy is now.

 Just off the top of my head, Joe Montanas went to Notre Dame therefore Jimmy Clausen should be awesome right? Right?

edit: I went to University of Miami so I hate OSU. No dick riding that school here.

Edited by Moorgan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

The post was in reply to Razor's request to name a good QB that was small and had nothing to do with Young. Razor didn't say the QB had to be in the modern era either and had just said name one like it hadn't ever happened before. He would have had a point if there never had been small players at QB before, but history shows there has been though it has been rare. And yeah, players have gotten bigger over the years, but that's true for people in general.

And I want Ahlers at 1 for the laughs but will settle for Richardson, Hooker, or Levis. Come to think about it, Bennett who is another smaller guy at 1 would work too.

I think it's perfectly reasonable to be cautious about hinging the hopes of your franchise and someone who will be touching the football more than anyone else when his most favorable comps are Wilson and Murray. But alas Stroud Richardson and yes Young are the only options in my eyes. Levis is Darnold. Do not want.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

I don’t understand this argument. I’ve seen it a lot and I don’t understand how a college QB history as any meaningful effect on how good a guy is now.

 Just off the top of my head, Joe Montanas went to Notre Dame therefore Jimmy Clausen should be awesome right? Right?

edit: I went to University of Miami so I hate OSU. No dick riding that school here.

This is a bad argument, the better one would be "no QB's have come from X system".

 

How many great QB's has Purdue or Miami of Ohio produced?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, frankw said:

I think it's perfectly reasonable to be cautious about hinging the hopes of your franchise and someone who will be touching the football more than anyone else when his most favorable comps are Wilson and Murray. But alas Stroud Richardson and yes Young are the only options in my eyes. Levis is Darnold. Do not want.

I agree about being cautious with the pick. It's only possibly their jobs if they're wrong unlike fans. That's why they need to do all the research on the choices as they can and make the best educated guess they can on which one will succeed in the NFL.

I don't worry about size because one bad angle while being hit or even delivering a hit is all it takes for any player's career and possibly life to end. Being injury prone? Totally depends on luck and might not have anything to do with contact especially with guys tripping on turf.

What I'm concerned with is if a guy can face down the pressure/rush and not let it affect his decision making. Once he gets hit, does he shrug off the hit and go right back to making plays or does he let it make him frantic and take a while to calm down again? Can he scramble in the pocket and backfield to extend plays when things break down or does he force a pass or take off running or stand there and take a sack? Is the guy consistent? Can he make throws in tight windows?

On to Stroud, Richardson, Levis, and Young specifically.

Young's biggest issue is his size. Can he hold up to an NFL schedule for years? Personally, I think he can. But we won't find out until he actually plays in the NFL. As has been said a lot, if Young had Stroud's size, people would be saying he was the sure fire can't miss QB ala Manning, Luck, etc.

Stroud's biggest issue to me is how he plays when pressured/rushed. He stepped up against Georgia and played the best game of his career. But all season he reacted badly to pressure. Stroud just wasn't used to it since his Oline kept his jersey clean most games. He's not going to have an elite Oline here or on most teams to be honest. Carolina's Oline is a little above average at best right now. Hopefully that will continue to improve, but back to Stroud. Was the Georgia game the single best game of Stroud's life or was it him turning the corner and the start of something great? As with Young, we won't know until he actually plays in the NFL.

Richardson's biggest issues are consistency and if he can be molded into more than a physical specimen. By the end of last season Richardson was playing with guys that won't ever play beyond college and were probably lucky to be playing at all. Richardson did let his footwork get away from him at times even as he showed decent decision making as the season went. But his receivers didn't do him any favors. If Richardson lands in the right situation, he really could end up special.

Levis does give off strong Darnold vibes and I don't want him to be a Panther either. We've seen that show once and it wasn't good. I say pass on the remake.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Cary Kollins said:

Stroud is the “safer” pick for sure, I just have this vision of us passing on Young and he turns into a superstar by year three.

 

11 minutes ago, Pazhoosier89 said:

Young is mini Mahomes. Change my mind. If they pass on him they may regret it. His only flaw is his size.

I agree, Young has that magic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I agree about being cautious with the pick. It's only possibly their jobs if they're wrong unlike fans. That's why they need to do all the research on the choices as they can and make the best educated guess they can on which one will succeed in the NFL.

I don't worry about size because one bad angle while being hit or even delivering a hit is all it takes for any player's career and possibly life to end. Being injury prone? Totally depends on luck and might not have anything to do with contact especially with guys tripping on turf.

What I'm concerned with is if a guy can face down the pressure/rush and not let it affect his decision making. Once he gets hit, does he shrug off the hit and go right back to making plays or does he let it make him frantic and take a while to calm down again? Can he scramble in the pocket and backfield to extend plays when things break down or does he force a pass or take off running or stand there and take a sack? Is the guy consistent? Can he make throws in tight windows?

On to Stroud, Richardson, Levis, and Young specifically.

Young's biggest issue is his size. Can he hold up to an NFL schedule for years? Personally, I think he can. But we won't find out until he actually plays in the NFL. As has been said a lot, if Young had Stroud's size, people would be saying he was the sure fire can't miss QB ala Manning, Luck, etc.

Stroud's biggest issue to me is how he plays when pressured/rushed. He stepped up against Georgia and played the best game of his career. But all season he reacted badly to pressure. Stroud just wasn't used to it since his Oline kept his jersey clean most games. He's not going to have an elite Oline here or on most teams to be honest. Carolina's Oline is a little above average at best right now. Hopefully that will continue to improve, but back to Stroud. Was the Georgia game the single best game of Stroud's life or was it him turning the corner and the start of something great? As with Young, we won't know until he actually plays in the NFL.

Richardson's biggest issues are consistency and if he can be molded into more than a physical specimen. By the end of last season Richardson was playing with guys that won't ever play beyond college and were probably lucky to be playing at all. Richardson did let his footwork get away from him at times even as he showed decent decision making as the season went. But his receivers didn't do him any favors. If Richardson lands in the right situation, he really could end up special.

Levis does give off strong Darnold vibes and I don't want him to be a Panther either. We've seen that show once and it wasn't good. I say pass on the remake.

I'm with you on pretty much everything here. But keep in mind that knock on Stroud relating to pressure will apply to any rookie we draft. I've been trying to tell folks to be cautiously optimistic about our oline. It remains a work in progress and depth is still a concern.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

🙄

You obviously haven't kept your finger on the pulse of the Huddle, but that's OK. To be sure, I haven't seen too many people who will be mad if we draft Stroud. I have seen more than a few who will be mad if we draft the small-framed Young. But you have the right to believe what you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, frankw said:

I'm with you on pretty much everything here. But keep in mind that knock on Stroud relating to pressure will apply to any rookie we draft. I've been trying to tell folks to be cautiously optimistic about our oline. It remains a work in progress and depth is still a concern.

The thing about the knock on Stroud is that it was against lesser competition in a non SEC conference in most cases. Georgia and Michigan were the only two teams he played that were on par with OSU.

I agree about the Oline. The starters are pretty good or getting better, but the line is one key injury away from sucking again until they add proper depth. I highly doubt they do it, but I'd like to see the Panthers spend the mid round picks on nothing but Oline depth.

A little about Richardson. If he doesn't end up in the right situation where he has a good QB coach and the team can give him some time, he'll probably bust hard. As has been said before, he's the definition of a boom or bust player. I don't know if the Panthers are the right situation for him. On paper the coaches are excellent, but McCown has never coached beyond high school before. It remains to be seen how good a coach he'll actually be. One last thing is just how much time Reich and Caldwell could give Richardson if McCown doesn't prove to be a good coach?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, frankw said:

So one player you aren't in favor of is deemed injury prone after a single game but a guy who is even smaller will never face that problem? You guys can't even be consistent within one thread.

You guys? What is with the constant uneducated takes here?

Matt Corral was injury prone in college, and couldn’t even last a preseason game in the NFL before a major injury.

Bryce was not. And will not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jayboogieman said:

The thing about the knock on Stroud is that it was against lesser competition in a non SEC conference in most cases. Georgia and Michigan were the only two teams he played that were on par with OSU.

I agree about the Oline. The starters are pretty good or getting better, but the line is one key injury away from sucking again until they add proper depth. I highly doubt they do it, but I'd like to see the Panthers spend the mid round picks on nothing but Oline depth.

A little about Richardson. If he doesn't end up in the right situation where he has a good QB coach and the team can give him some time, he'll probably bust hard. As has been said before, he's the definition of a boom or bust player. I don't know if the Panthers are the right situation for him. On paper the coaches are excellent, but McCown has never coached beyond high school before. It remains to be seen how good a coach he'll actually be. One last thing is just how much time Reich and Caldwell could give Richardson if McCown doesn't prove to be a good coach?

Yeah I'm not worried about that with Stroud or Young any of these QB's could bust we could argue all day long about the level of competition they faced. There are other QB's who have feasted on lesser teams who have gone on to do big things in the NFL and there are QB's who have beaten great college teams and went on to become busts. It's a crapshoot like the saying goes. Richardson is a huge gamble for whichever team takes him but if he is committed to working on his game I could see him doing some Lamar Jackson like things.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

You guys? What is with the constant uneducated takes here?

Matt Corral was injury prone in college, and couldn’t even last a preseason game in the NFL before a major injury.

Bryce was not. And will not. 

Uneducated takes eh? You aren't exactly offering Stephen Hawking level insight yourself here let's not get carried away insulting each other.

I am a Corral skeptic I think he's basically done here barring something magical but I can't say his career is done not by a longshot. And I think you are being premature at best to label him injury prone. In college he had 2 grade 1 ankle sprains and a bruised rib. If we are calling that injury prone then Bryce Young already having nursed a shoulder injury at Alabama is something to consider. Or maybe you are not able to see past your own bias on the matter 🤷‍♂️

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...